From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf/verifier: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to match ksize() usage
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:52:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da0959e7-a91c-ab4c-56be-3c3cd280e592@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221029025433.2533810-2-keescook@chromium.org>
On 10/29/22 4:54 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Round up allocations with kmalloc_size_roundup() so that the verifier's
> use of ksize() is always accurate and no special handling of the memory
> is needed by KASAN, UBSAN_BOUNDS, nor FORTIFY_SOURCE. Pass the new size
> information back up to callers so they can use the space immediately,
> so array resizing to happen less frequently as well.
>
[...]
The commit message is a bit cryptic here without further context. Is this
a bug fix or improvement? I read the latter, but it would be good to have
more context here for reviewers (maybe Link tag pointing to some discussion
or the like). Also, why is the kmalloc_size_roundup() not hidden for kmalloc
callers, isn't this a tree-wide issue?
Thanks,
Daniel
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index eb8c34db74c7..1c040d27b8f6 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -1008,9 +1008,9 @@ static void *copy_array(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t
> if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(n, size, &bytes)))
> return NULL;
>
> - if (ksize(dst) < bytes) {
> + if (ksize(dst) < ksize(src)) {
> kfree(dst);
> - dst = kmalloc_track_caller(bytes, flags);
> + dst = kmalloc_track_caller(kmalloc_size_roundup(bytes), flags);
> if (!dst)
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -1027,12 +1027,14 @@ static void *copy_array(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t
> */
> static void *realloc_array(void *arr, size_t old_n, size_t new_n, size_t size)
> {
> + size_t alloc_size;
> void *new_arr;
>
> if (!new_n || old_n == new_n)
> goto out;
>
> - new_arr = krealloc_array(arr, new_n, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + alloc_size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size_mul(new_n, size));
> + new_arr = krealloc(arr, alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!new_arr) {
> kfree(arr);
> return NULL;
> @@ -2504,9 +2506,11 @@ static int push_jmp_history(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> {
> u32 cnt = cur->jmp_history_cnt;
> struct bpf_idx_pair *p;
> + size_t alloc_size;
>
> cnt++;
> - p = krealloc(cur->jmp_history, cnt * sizeof(*p), GFP_USER);
> + alloc_size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size_mul(cnt, sizeof(*p)));
> + p = krealloc(cur->jmp_history, alloc_size, GFP_USER);
> if (!p)
> return -ENOMEM;
> p[cnt - 1].idx = env->insn_idx;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-01 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-29 2:54 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf/verifier: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to match ksize() usage Kees Cook
2022-10-29 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf/verifier: Fix potential memory leak in array reallocation Kees Cook
2022-10-31 20:16 ` Bill Wendling
2022-11-01 13:46 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-11-15 16:07 ` Lorenz Bauer
2022-10-29 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf/verifier: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to match ksize() usage Kees Cook
2022-11-01 13:52 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2022-11-01 17:01 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-29 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf/verifier: Take advantage of full allocation sizes Kees Cook
2022-10-31 21:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-01 5:23 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf/verifier: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to match ksize() usage patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da0959e7-a91c-ab4c-56be-3c3cd280e592@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox