From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A806A174C2 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.12]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C25358A; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 10:52:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1688147521; x=1688752321; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=7fMQgTejJQrtyw0lRthiHunfaisFvXW2eACXGaXi+2A=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=vu1Y2GI+m5wjl0jfEX/2y+KIYyV8s75aok2IQO8xGvUDOHKBCRYlc0xRqBls12hgUZZ0dmp nlTyL7zf7muSE7FBNZSfLbphJtwkO+VnvrXLP2WYGhttkGT2gr/uFmkNbO27neLptExzon+Pf OncBeLTbJ6B89EHTikrcyHdBHvIWqpzqTcQYcgDgGC4ibrYyKZesfWMU7RjUIwUs4Q6E6J9zB jR2J3D+HgB5OIK42gKUmYeOgpKl4W5SagRagnZOm3NTyEruDDv8LddWZcpzQJN+zF/3DVF46J 7FW2JSynG+GVctzRcHOGsvmjJ7SmXEiKmdEIESXQA0UE2a1spOfQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.90.83]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb106 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MRW2R-1qRANI30E9-00NGVr; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:52:01 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:52:00 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: [v2 01/13] perf parse-events: Remove unused PE_PMU_EVENT_FAKE token Content-Language: en-GB To: Ian Rogers Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Alexander Shishkin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Athira Rajeev , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Kan Liang , Mark Rutland , Namhyung Kim , LKML References: <20230627181030.95608-2-irogers@google.com> <8dab7522-31de-2137-7474-991885932308@web.de> <59e92b31-cd78-5c0c-ef87-f0d824cd20f7@web.de> <44d77ec3-9a19-cfd5-4bba-4a23d0cd526b@web.de> From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:iCN341exA5bXbzQaMmVHs4YI3jSObjArugLbMkrdHAJGSSQqDt4 qqQPKVTbknO4ZP3VhIiqbr9EKF5BsTGhQ0T5hIC3w7G2jDcTwJtCgPIC9GIQ6yiw3L9ZnpD CiZdQQ1yXCDcVY1FtWgj7Xr0t8duLvsKkUAdtKIHB/HgjzcSfYcxmqL4I5Sa9c/J0AC38KC gr6h7qJ3kksMrzjRImFYw== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:EAloMHjNawI=;wlPsJrKlJd1Vil2zYGi2YeLsJaj ktJbCP2tE8DSO+0xemhS0Cu1Bk3mqYaSbW6zU8YhkJhYCjjxcdi9uzSNSG6N4HTjYxczdu7ez EZFEzd3gXCq/9yAdoyyaJ2P6higX+GdLmM14VA1V1goGY3RDmCh9rxfFB5C+4pyXsSz1G3c0P 7pnkYElHDQMA/ROr+VMD4n5bqyiv8TiXCgxaPFgkiCERRXtZPzDWhOtYwwTrbT2pKPSmr9gq3 QIbWqB3Vg23hgxW+llLf13vdps1ZUDMQ8jeb7JAqeB2p9OUpR6MDVFgwNtv29ASwnZzpx1GSU 3/jTaNX1aa8ZBxqyRCYERQpwVF+uGmGYvv6dZdJWnZMW0zeaXZiJdTtuJodCOJXeJeJRUTyiI eMFgHsfdk0Qqp40kNV3R3uws56vaHubX6JLP6vqIaYpPBYCFBO4nJbw/cjpjU+T+oEB604BSv FMF/rsYcmjN+cSHHOu/tv9mz6jqo4V9EIN4KeqMPP5WO2X5AByUlUP3UoAuLG4NgbPwNiENkq SwDhw96SVo5WNJh91GM8FS0sM7yVsiDtjdZnRQildypVgb9dVOTedk6UiygWBdX4jr0OcgVVn cy/CxeH6bKiJZYu8elx8rpzCFwhGswhJSwDgRQDwH/sh64DRutolQNaT+cNK845WkxMZ/KAxn gJYYTetm7KB4jGIbKLgkP5TQSiKE195+pMm3Sd7HmNHv7bQDqqnS1CeN1D8IV2Tz3dfXERq1p TIDuESk0EwDTFFOGgg1tIOA/Rby28JIF+b+dd5NBY9D51qzSPWtf1uwZy6cOplbkOs6yGPCo7 FbTtMj8E1WKoSYanjC7CzkttvDgGAowkW99l/w+an1D87ZiHnWckbF5UmTbxi5vcxh3hjjjbO dLYSXlE6xBqiY6hr7lPOhvzFduAkqbeLbSEBxJMyu14fgW4+xJy1kXhV32+z8RQiHd3MBsJ01 88yahQ== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net >> Can the mentioned patch review concern be adjusted with wording alterna= tives >> for improved commit messages? > > Sorry, checked with a colleague and kernel contributor, Interesting =E2=80=A6 > we don't know what is being requested here, Another bit of attention for a known information source: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Do= cumentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=3Dv6.4#n94 > "imperative mood" makes no sense, How does such an opinion fit to the Linux development documentation? > as such I don't have a fix for what you're requesting. I got the impression that further possibilities can be taken better into a= ccount also for improved change descriptions. Regards, Markus