BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,  daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 06/13] bpf: remove unnecessary and (mostly) ignored BTF check for main program
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 20:05:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd98111ffdb0bc8c7367e44b4eb3e895e5813913.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bza0oz_qBXO6Xdh5KYAQsLYgCmvPhXeBUxFQOrFGAEudkg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 09:59 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > index 16d5550eda4d..642260d277ce 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > @@ -19899,18 +19899,6 @@ static int do_check_common(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
> > >               /* 1st arg to a function */
> > >               regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_CTX;
> > >               mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_1);
> > > -             ret = btf_check_subprog_arg_match(env, subprog, regs);
> > 
> > Not sure if this is important or not. btf_check_subprog_arg_match()
> > might have set 'func_info_aux[subprog].unreliable = true'.
> > bpf_check_attach_target() checks this flag for subprograms that are
> > being replaced, and seem to be ok accepting 'subprog == 0'.
> > This change makes it so .unreliable is never set for 'subprog == 0'.
> 
> True, I missed this corner case. But I'm now wondering if it is
> actually better to have a dedicated check just for entry program which
> explicitly checks that we have one argument and it's a PTR_TO_CTX
> (taking into account tags as well). btf_check_subprog_arg_match()
> business is way too indirect and subtle, IMO.

Dedicated check sounds more direct indeed.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-06 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-04 23:39 [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] Enhance BPF global subprogs with argument tags Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/13] bpf: log PTR_TO_MEM memory size in verifier log Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:23   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/13] bpf: emit more dynptr information " Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:24   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] bpf: tidy up exception callback management a bit Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:25   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-06 17:59   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/13] bpf: use bitfields for simple per-subprog bool flags Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:25   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/13] bpf: abstract away global subprog arg preparation logic from reg state setup Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-06 17:59     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/13] bpf: remove unnecessary and (mostly) ignored BTF check for main program Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-06 17:59     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-06 18:05       ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/13] bpf: prepare btf_prepare_func_args() for handling static subprogs Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:26   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/13] bpf: move subprog call logic back to verifier.c Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05  8:01   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-05 18:57     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05  9:04   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-05 11:46   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-05 23:27   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/13] bpf: reuse subprog argument parsing logic for subprog call checks Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 10:21   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-05 11:25   ` kernel test robot
2023-12-05 23:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-06 18:05     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/13] bpf: support 'arg:xxx' btf_decl_tag-based hints for global subprog args Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:22   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-06 18:15     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-06 18:47       ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/13] bpf: add dynptr global subprog arg tag support Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:22   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-06 18:17     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/13] libbpf: add __arg_xxx macros for annotating global func args Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 23:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: add global subprog annotation tests Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 23:29   ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd98111ffdb0bc8c7367e44b4eb3e895e5813913.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox