From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v6 3/3] bpf: return VMA snapshot from task_vma iterator
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 14:15:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <debb9f27-443a-4277-b252-de8efc09697a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408154539.3832150-4-puranjay@kernel.org>
On 4/8/26 4:45 PM, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> Holding the per-VMA lock across the BPF program body creates a lock
> ordering problem when helpers acquire locks that depend on mmap_lock:
>
> vm_lock -> i_rwsem -> mmap_lock -> vm_lock
>
> Snapshot the VMA under the per-VMA lock in _next() via memcpy(), then
> drop the lock before returning. The BPF program accesses only the
> snapshot.
>
> The verifier only trusts vm_mm and vm_file pointers (see
> BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED_OR_NULL in verifier.c). vm_file is reference-
> counted with get_file() under the lock and released via fput() on the
> next iteration or in _destroy(). vm_mm is already correct because
> lock_vma_under_rcu() verifies vma->vm_mm == mm. All other pointers
> are left as-is by memcpy() since the verifier treats them as untrusted.
>
> Fixes: 4ac454682158 ("bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs")
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> index 87e87f18913d..e791ae065c39 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> @@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ static inline void bpf_iter_mmput_async(struct mm_struct *mm)
> struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data {
> struct task_struct *task;
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> - struct vm_area_struct *locked_vma;
> + struct vm_area_struct snapshot;
> u64 next_addr;
> };
>
> @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_vma_new(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it,
>
> /*
> * Reject irqs-disabled contexts including NMI. Operations used
> - * by _next() and _destroy() (vma_end_read, bpf_iter_mmput_async)
> + * by _next() and _destroy() (vma_end_read, fput, bpf_iter_mmput_async)
> * can take spinlocks with IRQs disabled (pi_lock, pool->lock).
> * Running from NMI or from a tracepoint that fires with those
> * locks held could deadlock.
> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_vma_new(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it,
> goto err_cleanup_iter;
> }
>
> - kit->data->locked_vma = NULL;
> + kit->data->snapshot.vm_file = NULL;
> kit->data->next_addr = addr;
> return 0;
>
> @@ -947,26 +947,45 @@ bpf_iter_task_vma_find_next(struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data *data)
> return vma;
> }
>
> +static void bpf_iter_task_vma_snapshot_reset(struct vm_area_struct *snap)
> +{
> + if (snap->vm_file) {
> + fput(snap->vm_file);
> + snap->vm_file = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> __bpf_kfunc struct vm_area_struct *bpf_iter_task_vma_next(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it)
> {
> struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern *kit = (void *)it;
> - struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct vm_area_struct *snap, *vma;
>
> if (!kit->data) /* bpf_iter_task_vma_new failed */
> return NULL;
>
> - if (kit->data->locked_vma) {
> - vma_end_read(kit->data->locked_vma);
> - kit->data->locked_vma = NULL;
> - }
> + snap = &kit->data->snapshot;
> +
> + bpf_iter_task_vma_snapshot_reset(snap);
>
> vma = bpf_iter_task_vma_find_next(kit->data);
> if (!vma)
> return NULL;
>
> - kit->data->locked_vma = vma;
> + memcpy(snap, vma, sizeof(*snap));
> +
> + /*
> + * The verifier only trusts vm_mm and vm_file (see
> + * BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED_OR_NULL in verifier.c). Take a reference
> + * on vm_file; vm_mm is already correct because lock_vma_under_rcu()
> + * verifies vma->vm_mm == mm. All other pointers are untrusted by
> + * the verifier and left as-is.
> + */
> + if (snap->vm_file)
> + get_file(snap->vm_file);
> +
> kit->data->next_addr = vma->vm_end;
> - return vma;
> + vma_end_read(vma);
> + return snap;
> }
>
> __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it)
> @@ -974,8 +993,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it)
> struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern *kit = (void *)it;
>
> if (kit->data) {
> - if (kit->data->locked_vma)
> - vma_end_read(kit->data->locked_vma);
> + bpf_iter_task_vma_snapshot_reset(&kit->data->snapshot);
> put_task_struct(kit->data->task);
> bpf_iter_mmput_async(kit->data->mm);
> bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, kit->data);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-09 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 15:45 [PATCH bpf v6 0/3] bpf: fix and improve open-coded task_vma iterator Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-08 15:45 ` [PATCH bpf v6 1/3] bpf: fix mm lifecycle in " Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-08 15:45 ` [PATCH bpf v6 2/3] bpf: switch task_vma iterator from mmap_lock to per-VMA locks Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-08 15:45 ` [PATCH bpf v6 3/3] bpf: return VMA snapshot from task_vma iterator Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-09 13:15 ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]
2026-04-10 19:10 ` [PATCH bpf v6 0/3] bpf: fix and improve open-coded " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=debb9f27-443a-4277-b252-de8efc09697a@gmail.com \
--to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox