BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Cassen <acassen@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PF_PACKET RPS like using bpf
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:45:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e08f55b0-aaae-4c03-ac69-e76fc6725cd1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f3325fe-4417-4024-9830-039f9c505ae0@linux.dev>



On 18/03/2024 17:40, Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> On 3/15/24 11:30 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>> On 03/15, Alexandre Cassen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/03/2024 18:31, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>>> On 03/14, Alexandre Cassen wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> While implementing a large scale L2 processing soft, there is a 
>>>>> need for
>>>>> high perf ingress handling.
>>>>>
>>>>> In short: using BPF socket_filter prog with a hash func over ethernet
>>>>> address to distribute load across multiple PF_PACKET sockets: mainly
>>>>> filtering out non related hkey packets. It simplify userland app by 
>>>>> using
>>>>> multiple PF_PACKET sockets in dedicated pthread.
>>>>>
>>>>> Longer discussion + quick source code illustration here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/acassen/bpf-pfpacket-rps
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My question would be related to sockmap. I tried to figure out how to
>>>>> perform the same policing design using sockmap. And cant find my 
>>>>> way around
>>>>> it :/ If bpf verdict prog can get socket fd from __sk_buff then it 
>>>>> could
>>>>> drives the same hash/policing decision.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to get socket fd from __sk_buff from sockmap verdict 
>>>>> prog ?
>>>> Don't have an answer about sockmap, but I'd suggest you look at AF_XDP
>>>> if you want the best perf out there with raw frames.
>>>> IIRC, it just recently got a mode where you can redirect into multiple
>>>> sockets (== consumer threads):
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=2863d665ea41
>>> thanks for replying, __sk_buff bpf mirror doesnt export struct sock as
>>> present into kernel skbuff, so no options but extending.
>>> AF_XDP is an option. Will extend test code with it later on.
>> We do export bpf_sock in __sk_buff:
>>
>>     __bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_sock *, sk);
>>
>> But it has a very minimal set of 'struct sock' fields exported.
> 
> You could use bpf_core_cast() in bpf_core_read.h to cast 'struct 
> bpf_sock' to kernel 'struct sock'.


good idea, other option could be to userland set SO_MARK one time and 
get it back from bpf prog via bpf_sock.mark to drive policing decision

      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-14  8:05 PF_PACKET RPS like using bpf Alexandre Cassen
2024-03-15 17:31 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-03-15 18:06   ` Alexandre Cassen
2024-03-15 18:30     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-03-18 16:40       ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-18 21:45         ` Alexandre Cassen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e08f55b0-aaae-4c03-ac69-e76fc6725cd1@gmail.com \
    --to=acassen@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox