From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix percpu map update indexing with sparse CPU IDs
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:00:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3ff24e6-f0e0-415a-acfa-4f541796d109@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813120250.796934-4-sh_def@163.com>
Hi Hui,
Thanks for the further fixes.
On 2026/8/13 20:02, Hui Su wrote:
> Per-CPU array, hash, and cgroup storage map updates without BPF_F_CPU
> or BPF_F_ALL_CPUS use a value buffer whose per-CPU slots are packed in
> possible-CPU order. The buffer is sized as:
>
> round_up(value_size, 8) * num_possible_cpus()
>
> The update paths iterate over possible CPUs, but use the logical CPU ID
> to calculate the source offset:
>
> value + size * cpu
>
> This only works when possible CPU IDs are contiguous starting at zero.
>
> For example, with a possible CPU mask of 0,2-3, the buffer contains
> three slots corresponding to CPUs 0, 2, and 3. CPU2 is therefore
> expected to use slot 1 and CPU3 slot 2. Instead, the current code uses
> slots 2 and 3 respectively, causing incorrect per-CPU values and an
> out-of-bounds read from the update buffer for CPU3.
>
> The corresponding lookup paths already use a dense offset while
> iterating over possible CPUs. Do the same for the array, hash, and
> cgroup storage update paths, advancing the source offset once for each
> possible CPU. BPF_F_ALL_CPUS continues to use the same value for every
> CPU.
>
> Fixes: 8eb76cb03f0f ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps")
The ci bot got the point about the missing Fixes:
Fixes: c6936161fd55 ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags
support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps")
Fixes: 47c79f05aa0d ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags
support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps")
> Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
This Reported-by is unnecessary, because Sashiko would review most LKML
patches.
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Acked-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Thanks,
Leon
> ---
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 12:02 [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix percpu map update indexing with sparse CPU IDs Hui Su
2026-08-13 12:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-13 15:00 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3ff24e6-f0e0-415a-acfa-4f541796d109@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox