From: "Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: "John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Jakub Sitnicki" <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Cong Wang" <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf, sockmap: Fix concurrency issues between memory charge and uncharge
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 15:10:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e568d71aa0c1f7397c755ce6f0a71540931ebc3e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250519200003.46elezpkkfx5grl4@gmail.com>
May 20, 2025 at 04:00, "John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2025-05-18 11:48:31, Cong Wang wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > Solution:
> >
> > 1. Add locking to the kfree_sk_msg() process, which is only called in the
> >
> > user process context.
> >
> > 2. Integrate the charge process into sk_psock_create_ingress_msg() in the
> >
> > backlog process and add locking.
> >
> > 3. Reuse the existing psock->ingress_lock.
> >
> >
> >
> > Reusing the psock->ingress_lock looks weird to me, as it is intended for
> >
> > locking ingress queue, at least at the time it was introduced.
> >
> >
> >
> > And technically speaking, it is the sock lock which is supposed to serialize
> >
> > socket charging.
> >
> >
> >
> > So is there any better solution here?
> >
>
> Agree I would be more apt to add the sock_lock back to the backlog then
>
> to punish fast path this way.
>
> Holding the ref cnt on the psock stops blocks the sk_psock_destroy() in
>
> backlog now so is this still an issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
Thanks to Cong and John for their feedback.
For TCP, lock_sock(sk) works as expected. However, since we now support
multiple socket types (UNIX, UDP), the locking mechanism must be adapted
accordingly.
For UNIX sockets, we must use u->iolock instead of lock_sock(sk) in the
backlog path. This is because we already acquire lock(u->iolock) in both:
'''
unix_bpf_recvmsg() (BPF handler)
unix_stream_read_generic() (native handler)
'''
For UDP, the native handler __skb_recv_udp() locks udp_sk(sk)->reader_queue->lock,
but no locking is implemented in udp_bpf_recvmsg(). This implies that ingress_lock
effectively serves the same purpose as udp_sk(sk)->reader_queue->lock to prevent
concurrent user-space access.
Conclusion:
To avoid using ingress_lock, we need to implement a per-socket locking strategy into psock:
Default implementation: lock_sock(sk)
UNIX sockets: Use lock(u->iolock) in backlog path.
UDP sockets: Explicitly use reader_queue->lock both in udp_bpf_recvmsg() and backlog path.
As of now, I don’t have any better ideas.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 6:24 [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf, sockmap: Fix concurrency issues between memory charge and uncharge Jiayuan Chen
2025-05-18 18:48 ` Cong Wang
2025-05-19 20:00 ` John Fastabend
2025-05-20 15:10 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e568d71aa0c1f7397c755ce6f0a71540931ebc3e@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).