BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andriin@fb.com>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
	"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@chromium.org>, "Daniel Xu" <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	"Jesper Brouer" <jbrouer@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Viktor Malik" <vmalik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add support for ftrace probe
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:31:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea9da77e-3cd9-874d-c1fe-086b7889d669@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415141831.7b8fbe72@gandalf.local.home>



On 4/15/21 11:18 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:39:45 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>>> I don't know how the BPF code does it, but if you are tracing the exit
>>> of a function, I'm assuming that you hijack the return pointer and replace
>>> it with a call to a trampoline that has access to the arguments. To do
>>
>> hi,
>> it's bit different, the trampoline makes use of the fact that the
>> call to trampoline is at the very begining of the function and, so
>> it can call the origin function with 'call function + 5' instr.
>>
>> so in nutshell the trampoline does:
>>
>>    call entry_progs
>>    call original_func+5
> 
> How does the above handle functions that have parameters on the stack?

In arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c, the following code

int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, 
void *image_end,
                                 const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
                                 struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
                                 void *orig_call)
{
         int ret, i, cnt = 0, nr_args = m->nr_args;
         int stack_size = nr_args * 8;
         struct bpf_tramp_progs *fentry = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
         struct bpf_tramp_progs *fexit = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
         struct bpf_tramp_progs *fmod_ret = 
&tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
         u8 **branches = NULL;
         u8 *prog;

         /* x86-64 supports up to 6 arguments. 7+ can be added in the 
future */
         if (nr_args > 6)
                 return -ENOTSUPP;
...

Here, nr_args will be maximumly 5 original arguments + "ret" value 
argument for fexit bpf program.

yes, it is a known limitation. I guess more can be added and pushed to
the stack. Looks like there is no strong request so this has not been
implemented yet.

> 
>>    call exit_progs
>>
>> you can check this in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c in moe detail:
>>
>>   * The assembly code when eth_type_trans is called from trampoline:
>>   *
>>   * push rbp
>>   * mov rbp, rsp
>>   * sub rsp, 24                     // space for skb, dev, return value
>>   * push rbx                        // temp regs to pass start time
>>   * mov qword ptr [rbp - 24], rdi   // save skb pointer to stack
>>   * mov qword ptr [rbp - 16], rsi   // save dev pointer to stack
>>   * call __bpf_prog_enter           // rcu_read_lock and preempt_disable
>>   * mov rbx, rax                    // remember start time if bpf stats are enabled
>>   * lea rdi, [rbp - 24]             // R1==ctx of bpf prog
>>   * call addr_of_jited_FENTRY_prog  // bpf prog can access skb and dev
>>
>> entry program called ^^^
>>
>>   * movabsq rdi, 64bit_addr_of_struct_bpf_prog  // unused if bpf stats are off
>>   * mov rsi, rbx                    // prog start time
>>   * call __bpf_prog_exit            // rcu_read_unlock, preempt_enable and stats math
>>   * mov rdi, qword ptr [rbp - 24]   // restore skb pointer from stack
>>   * mov rsi, qword ptr [rbp - 16]   // restore dev pointer from stack
>>   * call eth_type_trans+5           // execute body of eth_type_trans
>>
>> original function called ^^^
> 
> This would need to be limited to only functions that do not have any
> parameters on the stack.
> 
>>
>>   * mov qword ptr [rbp - 8], rax    // save return value
>>   * call __bpf_prog_enter           // rcu_read_lock and preempt_disable
>>   * mov rbx, rax                    // remember start time in bpf stats are enabled
>>   * lea rdi, [rbp - 24]             // R1==ctx of bpf prog
>>   * call addr_of_jited_FEXIT_prog   // bpf prog can access skb, dev, return value
>>
>> exit program called ^^^
>>
>>   * movabsq rdi, 64bit_addr_of_struct_bpf_prog  // unused if bpf stats are off
>>   * mov rsi, rbx                    // prog start time
>>   * call __bpf_prog_exit            // rcu_read_unlock, preempt_enable and stats math
>>   * mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - 8]    // restore eth_type_trans's return value
>>   * pop rbx
>>   * leave
>>   * add rsp, 8                      // skip eth_type_trans's frame
>>   * ret                             // return to its caller
>>
>>> this you need a shadow stack to save the real return as well as the
>>> parameters of the function. This is something that I have patches that do
>>> similar things with function graph.
>>>
>>> If you want this feature, lets work together and make this work for both
>>> BPF and ftrace.
>>
>> it's been some time I saw a graph tracer, is there a way to make it
>> access input arguments and make it available through ftrace_ops
>> interface?
> 
> I have patches that could easily make it do so. And should probably get
> them out again. The function graph tracer has a shadow stack, and my
> patches allow you to store data on it for use with the exiting of the
> program.
> 
> My last release of that code is here:
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190525031633.811342628@goodmis.org/
> 
> It allows you to "reserve data" to pass from the caller to the return, and
> that could hold the arguments. See patch 15 of that series.
> 
> 
> -- Steve
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-13 12:15 [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add support for ftrace probe Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Move bpf_prog_start/end functions to generic place Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 2/7] bpf: Add bpf_functions object Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Add support to attach program to ftrace probe Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Add btf__find_by_pattern_kind function Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: Add support to load and attach ftrace probe Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 6/7] selftests/bpf: Add ftrace probe to fentry test Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add ftrace probe test Jiri Olsa
2021-04-14  1:04 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add support for ftrace probe Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 12:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-14 22:46     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-15 14:00       ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-15 15:10       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 17:39         ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-15 18:18           ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 18:21             ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 21:49               ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-15 23:30                 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-19 20:51                   ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-19 22:00                     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 18:31             ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2021-04-15 20:45         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-15 21:00           ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-16 15:03             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-04-16 16:48               ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-19 14:29                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-04-20 12:51                 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-20 15:33                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-20 16:33                     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-20 16:52                     ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-20 23:38                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-21 13:40                         ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-21 14:05                           ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-21 18:52                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-21 19:18                               ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-22 14:24                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-21 21:37                             ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-22  1:17                               ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-20  4:51               ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea9da77e-3cd9-874d-c1fe-086b7889d669@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox