From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andriin@fb.com>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@chromium.org>, "Daniel Xu" <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
"Jesper Brouer" <jbrouer@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Viktor Malik" <vmalik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add support for ftrace probe
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:31:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea9da77e-3cd9-874d-c1fe-086b7889d669@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415141831.7b8fbe72@gandalf.local.home>
On 4/15/21 11:18 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:39:45 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> I don't know how the BPF code does it, but if you are tracing the exit
>>> of a function, I'm assuming that you hijack the return pointer and replace
>>> it with a call to a trampoline that has access to the arguments. To do
>>
>> hi,
>> it's bit different, the trampoline makes use of the fact that the
>> call to trampoline is at the very begining of the function and, so
>> it can call the origin function with 'call function + 5' instr.
>>
>> so in nutshell the trampoline does:
>>
>> call entry_progs
>> call original_func+5
>
> How does the above handle functions that have parameters on the stack?
In arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c, the following code
int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image,
void *image_end,
const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
void *orig_call)
{
int ret, i, cnt = 0, nr_args = m->nr_args;
int stack_size = nr_args * 8;
struct bpf_tramp_progs *fentry = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
struct bpf_tramp_progs *fexit = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
struct bpf_tramp_progs *fmod_ret =
&tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
u8 **branches = NULL;
u8 *prog;
/* x86-64 supports up to 6 arguments. 7+ can be added in the
future */
if (nr_args > 6)
return -ENOTSUPP;
...
Here, nr_args will be maximumly 5 original arguments + "ret" value
argument for fexit bpf program.
yes, it is a known limitation. I guess more can be added and pushed to
the stack. Looks like there is no strong request so this has not been
implemented yet.
>
>> call exit_progs
>>
>> you can check this in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c in moe detail:
>>
>> * The assembly code when eth_type_trans is called from trampoline:
>> *
>> * push rbp
>> * mov rbp, rsp
>> * sub rsp, 24 // space for skb, dev, return value
>> * push rbx // temp regs to pass start time
>> * mov qword ptr [rbp - 24], rdi // save skb pointer to stack
>> * mov qword ptr [rbp - 16], rsi // save dev pointer to stack
>> * call __bpf_prog_enter // rcu_read_lock and preempt_disable
>> * mov rbx, rax // remember start time if bpf stats are enabled
>> * lea rdi, [rbp - 24] // R1==ctx of bpf prog
>> * call addr_of_jited_FENTRY_prog // bpf prog can access skb and dev
>>
>> entry program called ^^^
>>
>> * movabsq rdi, 64bit_addr_of_struct_bpf_prog // unused if bpf stats are off
>> * mov rsi, rbx // prog start time
>> * call __bpf_prog_exit // rcu_read_unlock, preempt_enable and stats math
>> * mov rdi, qword ptr [rbp - 24] // restore skb pointer from stack
>> * mov rsi, qword ptr [rbp - 16] // restore dev pointer from stack
>> * call eth_type_trans+5 // execute body of eth_type_trans
>>
>> original function called ^^^
>
> This would need to be limited to only functions that do not have any
> parameters on the stack.
>
>>
>> * mov qword ptr [rbp - 8], rax // save return value
>> * call __bpf_prog_enter // rcu_read_lock and preempt_disable
>> * mov rbx, rax // remember start time in bpf stats are enabled
>> * lea rdi, [rbp - 24] // R1==ctx of bpf prog
>> * call addr_of_jited_FEXIT_prog // bpf prog can access skb, dev, return value
>>
>> exit program called ^^^
>>
>> * movabsq rdi, 64bit_addr_of_struct_bpf_prog // unused if bpf stats are off
>> * mov rsi, rbx // prog start time
>> * call __bpf_prog_exit // rcu_read_unlock, preempt_enable and stats math
>> * mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - 8] // restore eth_type_trans's return value
>> * pop rbx
>> * leave
>> * add rsp, 8 // skip eth_type_trans's frame
>> * ret // return to its caller
>>
>>> this you need a shadow stack to save the real return as well as the
>>> parameters of the function. This is something that I have patches that do
>>> similar things with function graph.
>>>
>>> If you want this feature, lets work together and make this work for both
>>> BPF and ftrace.
>>
>> it's been some time I saw a graph tracer, is there a way to make it
>> access input arguments and make it available through ftrace_ops
>> interface?
>
> I have patches that could easily make it do so. And should probably get
> them out again. The function graph tracer has a shadow stack, and my
> patches allow you to store data on it for use with the exiting of the
> program.
>
> My last release of that code is here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190525031633.811342628@goodmis.org/
>
> It allows you to "reserve data" to pass from the caller to the return, and
> that could hold the arguments. See patch 15 of that series.
>
>
> -- Steve
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-15 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 12:15 [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add support for ftrace probe Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Move bpf_prog_start/end functions to generic place Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 2/7] bpf: Add bpf_functions object Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Add support to attach program to ftrace probe Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Add btf__find_by_pattern_kind function Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: Add support to load and attach ftrace probe Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 6/7] selftests/bpf: Add ftrace probe to fentry test Jiri Olsa
2021-04-13 12:15 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add ftrace probe test Jiri Olsa
2021-04-14 1:04 ` [PATCHv2 RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add support for ftrace probe Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 12:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-14 22:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-15 14:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-15 15:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 17:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-15 18:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 18:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 21:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-15 23:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-19 20:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-19 22:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 18:31 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2021-04-15 20:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-15 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-16 15:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-04-16 16:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-19 14:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-04-20 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-20 15:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-20 16:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-20 16:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-20 23:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-21 13:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-21 14:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-21 18:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-21 19:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-22 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-21 21:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-04-22 1:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-20 4:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea9da77e-3cd9-874d-c1fe-086b7889d669@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox