public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,  martin.lau@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix dangling stdout seen by traffic monitor thread
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 16:12:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eadb0123e2e576effbf1c7b0eac6b1da9b107fd4.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304163626.1362031-3-ameryhung@gmail.com>

On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 08:36 -0800, Amery Hung wrote:
> Traffic monitor thread may see dangling stdout as the main thread closes
> and reassigns stdout without protection. This happens when the main thread
> finishes one subtest and moves to another one in the same netns_new()
> scope.
> The issue can be reproduced by running test_progs repeatedly with traffic
> monitor enabled:
> 
> for ((i=1;i<=100;i++)); do
>    ./test_progs -a flow_dissector_skb* -m '*'
> done
> 
> Fix it by first consolidating stdout assignment into stdio_restore().
> stdout will be restored to env.stdout_saved when a test ends or running
> in the crash handler and to test_state.stdout_saved otherwise.
> Then, protect use/close/reassignment of stdout with a lock. The locking
> in the main thread is always performed regradless of whether traffic
> monitor is running or not for simplicity. It won't have any side-effect.
> stdio_restore() is kept in the crash handler instead of making all print
> functions in the crash handler use env.stdout_saved to make it less
> error-prone.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
> ---

This patch fixes the error for me.

Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index ab0f2fed3c58..5b89f6ca5a0a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,11 @@ static void stdio_hijack(char **log_buf, size_t *log_cnt)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> -static void stdio_restore_cleanup(void)
> +static pthread_mutex_t stdout_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> +
> +static bool in_crash_handler(void);
> +
> +static void stdio_restore(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef __GLIBC__
>  	if (verbose() && env.worker_id == -1) {
> @@ -98,34 +102,34 @@ static void stdio_restore_cleanup(void)
>  
>  	fflush(stdout);
>  
> -	if (env.subtest_state) {
> +	pthread_mutex_lock(&stdout_lock);
> +
> +	if (!env.subtest_state || in_crash_handler()) {
> +		if (stdout == env.stdout_saved)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		fclose(env.test_state->stdout_saved);
> +		env.test_state->stdout_saved = NULL;
> +		stdout = env.stdout_saved;
> +		stderr = env.stderr_saved;
> +	} else {
>  		fclose(env.subtest_state->stdout_saved);
>  		env.subtest_state->stdout_saved = NULL;
>  		stdout = env.test_state->stdout_saved;
>  		stderr = env.test_state->stdout_saved;
> -	} else {
> -		fclose(env.test_state->stdout_saved);
> -		env.test_state->stdout_saved = NULL;
>  	}
> +out:
> +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&stdout_lock);
>  #endif
>  }

stdio_restore_cleanup() did not reset stderr/stdout when
env.subtest_state was NULL, but this difference does not seem to
matter, stdio_restore_cleanup() was called from:
- test__start_subtest(), where stdio_hijack_init() would override
  stderr/stdout anyways.
- run_one_test(), where it is followed by call to stdio_restore().

I think this change is Ok.

[...]

> @@ -1276,6 +1281,18 @@ void crash_handler(int signum)
>  	backtrace_symbols_fd(bt, sz, STDERR_FILENO);
>  }
>  
> +static bool in_crash_handler(void)
> +{
> +	struct sigaction sigact;
> +
> +	/* sa_handler will be cleared if invoked since crash_handler is
> +	 * registered with SA_RESETHAND
> +	 */
> +	sigaction(SIGSEGV, NULL, &sigact);
> +
> +	return sigact.sa_handler != crash_handler;
> +}
> +

The patch would be simpler w/o this function. I double checked
functions called from crash_handler() and two 'fprintf(stderr, ...)'
there are the only places where stderr/stdout is used instead of
*_saved versions. It is already a prevalent pattern to do
'fprintf(env.stderr_saved, ...)' in this file.
Or pass a flag as in v3?

>  void hexdump(const char *prefix, const void *buf, size_t len)
>  {
>  	for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> @@ -1957,6 +1974,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 16:36 [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] selftests/bpf: Clean up call sites of stdio_restore() Amery Hung
2025-03-04 16:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] selftests/bpf: Allow assigning traffic monitor print function Amery Hung
2025-03-04 16:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix dangling stdout seen by traffic monitor thread Amery Hung
2025-03-05  0:12   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-03-05 16:52     ` Amery Hung
2025-03-05  1:36   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-03-05 16:52     ` Amery Hung
2025-03-04 21:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] selftests/bpf: Clean up call sites of stdio_restore() Eduard Zingerman
2025-03-04 23:39   ` Amery Hung
2025-03-05  0:14     ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eadb0123e2e576effbf1c7b0eac6b1da9b107fd4.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox