From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix dangling stdout seen by traffic monitor thread
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 16:12:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eadb0123e2e576effbf1c7b0eac6b1da9b107fd4.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304163626.1362031-3-ameryhung@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 08:36 -0800, Amery Hung wrote:
> Traffic monitor thread may see dangling stdout as the main thread closes
> and reassigns stdout without protection. This happens when the main thread
> finishes one subtest and moves to another one in the same netns_new()
> scope.
> The issue can be reproduced by running test_progs repeatedly with traffic
> monitor enabled:
>
> for ((i=1;i<=100;i++)); do
> ./test_progs -a flow_dissector_skb* -m '*'
> done
>
> Fix it by first consolidating stdout assignment into stdio_restore().
> stdout will be restored to env.stdout_saved when a test ends or running
> in the crash handler and to test_state.stdout_saved otherwise.
> Then, protect use/close/reassignment of stdout with a lock. The locking
> in the main thread is always performed regradless of whether traffic
> monitor is running or not for simplicity. It won't have any side-effect.
> stdio_restore() is kept in the crash handler instead of making all print
> functions in the crash handler use env.stdout_saved to make it less
> error-prone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
> ---
This patch fixes the error for me.
Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index ab0f2fed3c58..5b89f6ca5a0a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,11 @@ static void stdio_hijack(char **log_buf, size_t *log_cnt)
> #endif
> }
>
> -static void stdio_restore_cleanup(void)
> +static pthread_mutex_t stdout_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> +
> +static bool in_crash_handler(void);
> +
> +static void stdio_restore(void)
> {
> #ifdef __GLIBC__
> if (verbose() && env.worker_id == -1) {
> @@ -98,34 +102,34 @@ static void stdio_restore_cleanup(void)
>
> fflush(stdout);
>
> - if (env.subtest_state) {
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&stdout_lock);
> +
> + if (!env.subtest_state || in_crash_handler()) {
> + if (stdout == env.stdout_saved)
> + goto out;
> +
> + fclose(env.test_state->stdout_saved);
> + env.test_state->stdout_saved = NULL;
> + stdout = env.stdout_saved;
> + stderr = env.stderr_saved;
> + } else {
> fclose(env.subtest_state->stdout_saved);
> env.subtest_state->stdout_saved = NULL;
> stdout = env.test_state->stdout_saved;
> stderr = env.test_state->stdout_saved;
> - } else {
> - fclose(env.test_state->stdout_saved);
> - env.test_state->stdout_saved = NULL;
> }
> +out:
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&stdout_lock);
> #endif
> }
stdio_restore_cleanup() did not reset stderr/stdout when
env.subtest_state was NULL, but this difference does not seem to
matter, stdio_restore_cleanup() was called from:
- test__start_subtest(), where stdio_hijack_init() would override
stderr/stdout anyways.
- run_one_test(), where it is followed by call to stdio_restore().
I think this change is Ok.
[...]
> @@ -1276,6 +1281,18 @@ void crash_handler(int signum)
> backtrace_symbols_fd(bt, sz, STDERR_FILENO);
> }
>
> +static bool in_crash_handler(void)
> +{
> + struct sigaction sigact;
> +
> + /* sa_handler will be cleared if invoked since crash_handler is
> + * registered with SA_RESETHAND
> + */
> + sigaction(SIGSEGV, NULL, &sigact);
> +
> + return sigact.sa_handler != crash_handler;
> +}
> +
The patch would be simpler w/o this function. I double checked
functions called from crash_handler() and two 'fprintf(stderr, ...)'
there are the only places where stderr/stdout is used instead of
*_saved versions. It is already a prevalent pattern to do
'fprintf(env.stderr_saved, ...)' in this file.
Or pass a flag as in v3?
> void hexdump(const char *prefix, const void *buf, size_t len)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> @@ -1957,6 +1974,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 16:36 [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] selftests/bpf: Clean up call sites of stdio_restore() Amery Hung
2025-03-04 16:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] selftests/bpf: Allow assigning traffic monitor print function Amery Hung
2025-03-04 16:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix dangling stdout seen by traffic monitor thread Amery Hung
2025-03-05 0:12 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-03-05 16:52 ` Amery Hung
2025-03-05 1:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-03-05 16:52 ` Amery Hung
2025-03-04 21:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] selftests/bpf: Clean up call sites of stdio_restore() Eduard Zingerman
2025-03-04 23:39 ` Amery Hung
2025-03-05 0:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eadb0123e2e576effbf1c7b0eac6b1da9b107fd4.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox