From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v14 6/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 22:25:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eae54df8-e589-4182-8c4f-5f14a8de904e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514004634.3DA09C19425@smtp.kernel.org>
On 2026/5/14 08:46, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
[...]
>> +
>> + err = __map_create(attr, uattr, log);
>> +
>> + /* preserve original error even if log finalization is successful */
>> + ret = bpf_log_attr_finalize(&attr_log, log);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (err >= 0)
>> + close_fd(err);
>
> Since __map_create() has already successfully created the map and installed
> the file descriptor via fd_install(), the fd is globally visible to the
> process at this point.
>
> If bpf_log_attr_finalize() fails (for example, due to an invalid pointer
> for log_true_size), we attempt to roll back by calling close_fd(err) and
> returning an error.
>
> Could this race with a concurrent thread?
>
> If another thread closes this fd and opens a new file between fd_install()
> and this close_fd() call, wouldn't we erroneously close an unrelated file?
>
> Also, if another thread dups the fd before we close it, wouldn't the BPF
> map remain alive and accessible to userspace even though the map_create
> syscall returned a failure?
>
Replied in v13
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3c9b4ff0-7a62-4053-83c7-23151905c742@linux.dev/.
Thanks,
Leon
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 15:31 [PATCH bpf-next v14 0/8] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 1/8] " Leon Hwang
2026-05-13 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 14:24 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 2/8] libbpf: Add support for extended BPF syscall Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 16:23 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 2:10 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 3/8] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 4/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
2026-05-13 23:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 5/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for btf_load Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 6/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create Leon Hwang
2026-05-14 0:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 14:25 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 7/8] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2026-05-14 1:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 14:25 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log Leon Hwang
2026-05-14 1:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 14:26 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 19:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 0/8] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eae54df8-e589-4182-8c4f-5f14a8de904e@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox