From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/13] bpf: Enable aggregate return types up to 16 bytes
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 11:23:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed5b21ef-eec2-4977-9ed0-c480bb82da2f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09a1229f680ad7b6e2d44aea142f76df94a69be7.camel@gmail.com>
On 8/12/26 3:47 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-08-10 at 17:09 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> Relax btf_distill_func_proto() to accept a by-value struct or union that
>> the R0:R2 convention added in earlier patches can carry:
>>
>> - a struct or union larger than 8 and up to 16 bytes, returned in the
>> R0:R2 register pair, matching what LLVM emits for the BPF target;
>> - a struct or union up to 8 bytes, returned in R0 alone.
>>
>> A >8 byte scalar (__int128) was already accepted and is unchanged.
>> Everything else stays rejected: a return type larger than 16 bytes, and any
>> type that __get_type_size() cannot return in registers at all (e.g. an
>> array), which it already reports as ret < 0.
>>
>> btf_distill_func_proto() also builds the trampoline (fentry/fexit/fmod_ret)
>> and struct_ops function models, so relaxing it widens what those can attach
>> to. A >8 byte return stays rejected on every path that reads the target's
>> return value: commit c48796aa6c39 ("bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on
>> return-reading trampoline paths") covers fexit, fmod_ret and fsession plus
>> their _multi variants, and struct_ops, and an fentry-only trampoline never
>> sets BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG so it does not touch the return value at all. A
>> struct or union of 8 bytes or less is newly accepted for those paths; its
>> single eightbyte is returned in R0 like any other scalar.
>>
>> btf_validate_return_type() is relaxed as well, so that it accepts a
>> by-value struct or union up to 16 bytes in addition to void and scalars.
>>
>> With btf_distill_func_proto() and btf_validate_return_type() relaxed, the
>> verifier, JIT, precision-backtracking and live-register support from the
>> earlier patches becomes reachable: this final patch enables <=16 byte
>> aggregate return values end to end.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> ---
> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> index 6606187ed4f4..5551abcea1d3 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> @@ -7592,7 +7592,12 @@ int btf_distill_func_proto(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> ret = __get_type_size(btf, func->type, &t);
>> - if (ret < 0 || btf_type_is_struct(t)) {
>> + /*
>> + * __get_type_size() already restricts a non-negative ret to void, a
>> + * pointer, an int, an enum or a struct/union, so only the size is checked
>> + * here.
>> + */
> Nit: I'd drop this comment.
Will do.
>
>> + if (ret < 0 || ret > 16) {
>> bpf_log(log,
>> "The function %s return type %s is unsupported.\n",
>> tname, btf_type_str(t));
> ...
>
>> @@ -7988,6 +7993,35 @@ static int btf_validate_return_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct btf *bt
>> if (btf_type_is_void(t) || btf_type_is_int(t) || btf_is_any_enum(t))
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if (btf_type_is_struct(t) && t->size <= 16) {
>> + /*
>> + * A >8 byte struct/union is returned in the R0:R2 register pair.
>> + * A global function is verified in isolation, so its caller models
>> + * the return as an opaque R0:R2 scalar pair; it must therefore
>> + * contain only scalars, otherwise a pointer field would be
>> + * laundered into a scalar and escape provenance and reference
>> + * tracking. That requirement is enforced here: do_check_common()
>> + * propagates the error for global functions and for the main
>> + * program.
>> + *
>> + * A local (static) function is verified inline and its R0:R2 are
>> + * copied as precise register state (with the JIT forced on when
>> + * the pair is consumed), so a pointer field stays tracked and needs
>> + * no such restriction. Accepting it here is not by itself what
>> + * makes it legal: btf_check_subprog_call() drops any error other
>> + * than -EFAULT. What it avoids is needlessly marking the
>> + * subprogram's BTF unreliable.
>> + *
>> + * The main program (subprog 0) takes the scalar-only path as well,
>> + * but its return value is the program's exit code, so a >8 byte
>> + * return is rejected separately at BPF_EXIT.
>> + */
> Nit: the comment is way too long, I'd drop the justification.
> Especially given that at the moment btf_validate_return_type()
> would only be called from main/global subprograms/callback subprograms.
Will do.
>
>> + bool local_func = subprog && !is_global;
>> +
>> + if (local_func || __btf_type_is_scalar_struct(env, btf, t, 0))
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index 8f0c4aed0781..f8294359c85d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> @@ -11088,9 +11088,9 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_implicit(const struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta, u32 arg_
>> }
>>
>> /* Returns true if struct is composed of scalars, 4 levels of nesting allowed */
>> -static bool __btf_type_is_scalar_struct(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>> - const struct btf *btf,
>> - const struct btf_type *t, int rec)
>> +bool __btf_type_is_scalar_struct(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>> + const struct btf *btf,
>> + const struct btf_type *t, int rec)
> Nit: since this function is now exported, let's drop the '__' prefix.
Will change.
>
>> {
>> const struct btf_type *member_type;
>> const struct btf_member *member;
> ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 0:09 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/13] bpf: Support aggregate return values up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/13] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/13] bpf: Add helpers to describe the R0:R2 return register pair Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 19:31 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 20:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:02 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/13] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 19:48 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 20:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/13] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 21:16 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:04 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/13] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 19:55 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 21:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:05 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/13] bpf: Reject callbacks returning more than 8 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 21:41 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:09 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/13] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 20:12 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:20 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/13] bpf: Reject register-pair returns when the subprog BTF is unreliable Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 20:26 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 22:24 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:22 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/13] bpf: Enable aggregate return types up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 20:29 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 22:47 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:23 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-08-11 0:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 20:49 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 23:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:24 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 21:08 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-12 23:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:25 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-13 0:09 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-11 0:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for callbacks returning more than 8 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 1:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12 21:22 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-13 0:10 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-13 18:27 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-11 0:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/13] Documentation/bpf: Document up to 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed5b21ef-eec2-4977-9ed0-c480bb82da2f@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox