BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Xu <dlxu@meta.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>,
	"bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org" <bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-ci <kernel-ci@meta.com>,
	"andrii@kernel.org" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"martin.lau@linux.dev" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] Fixes for LPM trie
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:43:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f17d65e4-9f41-4d67-a7e7-1eac4d98ca7b@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd947bab-1445-4d43-ce7e-ed53697d466a@huaweicloud.com>

Hi Hou,

On 11/17/24 22:20, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/18/2024 9:42 AM, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> Dear patch submitter,
>>
>> CI has tested the following submission:
>> Status:     SUCCESS
>> Name:       [bpf-next,00/10] Fixes for LPM trie
>> Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=910440&state=*
>> Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/11884065937
>>
>> No further action is necessary on your part.
>>
>>
>> Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have
>> questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at
>> kernel-ci@meta.com.
> I am curious about the reason on why test_maps on s390 is disabled. If I
> remember correctly, test_maps on s390 was still enabled last year [1].
>
> [1]: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/7164372250
>
It was disabled in 
https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/commit/5489ef2bc1fed11e841d2d3485ab80ce4b390d94 
.

I recall it was kinda flakey and low signal.

Thanks,

Daniel


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-18 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-18  1:07 [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] Fixes for LPM trie Hou Tao
2024-11-18  1:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/10] bpf: Remove unnecessary check when updating " Hou Tao
2024-11-21 10:22   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/10] bpf: Remove unnecessary kfree(im_node) in lpm_trie_update_elem Hou Tao
2024-11-21 10:25   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/10] bpf: Handle BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST for LPM trie Hou Tao
2024-11-18 13:39   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-11-19  1:08     ` Hou Tao
2024-11-21 10:32   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/10] bpf: Handle in-place update for full LPM trie correctly Hou Tao
2024-11-18 13:13   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-19  1:05     ` Hou Tao
2024-11-21 10:53   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-22  2:06     ` Hou Tao
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/10] bpf: Fix exact match conditions in trie_get_next_key() Hou Tao
2024-11-21 11:01   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/10] bpf: Add bpf_mem_cache_is_mergeable() helper Hou Tao
2024-11-18 13:29   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-11-19  1:06     ` Hou Tao
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/10] bpf: Switch to bpf mem allocator for LPM trie Hou Tao
2024-11-18 13:30   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-18 16:56     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-20  1:16   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-21  1:20     ` Hou Tao
2024-11-23  3:29       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-21 11:39   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-21 11:52     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-11-21 12:50       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-22  3:36         ` Hou Tao
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/10] bpf: Use raw_spinlock_t " Hou Tao
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: Move test_lpm_map.c to map_tests Hou Tao
2024-11-18  1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add more test cases for LPM trie Hou Tao
2024-11-18 17:46   ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-11-19  1:10     ` Hou Tao
     [not found] ` <46268aa9ef13a24388af833b17f6cef8bdd3a7be8402fec7640e65a2f1118468@mail.kernel.org>
2024-11-18  6:20   ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] Fixes " Hou Tao
2024-11-18 17:43     ` Daniel Xu [this message]
2024-11-19  1:09       ` Hou Tao
2024-11-18 15:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-19  1:35   ` Hou Tao
2024-11-19 14:15     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f17d65e4-9f41-4d67-a7e7-1eac4d98ca7b@meta.com \
    --to=dlxu@meta.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=kernel-ci@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox