BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sashiko-bot@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	 daniel@iogearbox.net, emil@etsalapatis.com, kkd@meta.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, 	martin.lau@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com, 	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/14] bpf: Preserve R0 lineage across helper calls
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 23:12:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f342767e1a33839d5074ee90971d832e21845651.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f50ce2b6d7a797d977cd80a04a3012fc7dd0c7e57a8cf043f13fe88fee89cc2@mail.kernel.org>

On Sun, 2026-08-16 at 02:30 +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index 5d0a2d3ef594..7ef324e384f4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -11024,13 +11024,13 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
> > 
> >  	/* reset caller saved regs */
> >  	bpf_diag_record_caller_saved(env, regs);
> > +	bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &regs[BPF_REG_0], NULL, BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
> >  	for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) {
> >  		bpf_mark_reg_not_init(env, &regs[caller_saved[i]]);
> >  		check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK);
> >  	}
> >  	invalidate_outgoing_stack_args(env, cur_func(env));
> > 
> > -	bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &regs[BPF_REG_0], NULL, BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
> >  	/* update return register (already marked as written above) */
> >  	ret_type = fn->ret_type;
> >  	ret_flag = type_flag(ret_type);
> 
> Does this produce the correct diagnostic message for void helpers? The
> new bpf_diag_mod_begin() is now opened unconditionally for all helpers,
> including those with RET_VOID. Because the snapshot is taken before the
> caller-saved clearing loop, a void helper now generates a history event
> with R0's real pre-call value as old and NOT_INIT as new, with reason
> BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE.

This is fine.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-16  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-16  1:57 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/14] Follow ups for verifier errors set Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/14] bpf: Correct verifier diagnostic attribution for stack reads Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  6:34   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/14] selftests/bpf: Test verifier stack-read diagnostic attribution Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  2:45   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-16  6:35   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/14] bpf: Preserve R0 lineage across helper calls Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  2:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-16  6:12     ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-08-16  6:36   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/14] bpf: Drop dead spill diagnostic condition Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  6:39   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/14] bpf: Use canonical stack argument names in diagnostics Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  6:40   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/14] bpf: Correct kfunc argument diagnostics Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  2:45   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-16  6:50     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  6:52   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/14] selftests/bpf: Test " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  6:53   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/14] bpf: Report non-sleepable kfunc programs accurately Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  2:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-16  7:32   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/14] selftests/bpf: Test non-sleepable kfunc context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  2:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-16  7:37   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/14] bpf: Correct Program Structure diagnostic context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  2:45   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-16  7:58   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/14] bpf: Preserve source attribution without source text Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  8:01   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/14] selftests/bpf: Test Program Structure diagnostic context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  8:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/14] bpf: Distinguish function references in policy diagnostics Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  8:09   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16  1:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/14] selftests/bpf: Test pseudo-function " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-16  2:45   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f342767e1a33839d5074ee90971d832e21845651.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kkd@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox