From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2114E66B8; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 10:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789554664; cv=none; b=HYSDIHmGE/gZwpQr3Iv1Ph3qJAh0d8wKUBOgL5m9+6vbwbyUo4lgv4kViB/T6T3KS1/0O+TGxdF+yx2wFs2P58EBmtDNRP+hrbqgscfQ+7cd6FgTfmH3lQeDfpnWW4yEi6Jh80KSK2bSpz4PDqujvBTn04zhM3cQpx0L1SsW+bg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789554664; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GEP+hGb2iE1o7wcjDbQ4fv1FVBbBCEuBYvDsihslWMo=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=nG12+PAZmqikaPQl7qWHmS9f1/9pupjiGjgSaNSHfBMX4aQOQUVRpi1dOFdTjHkJNrU6D6gVB/QPrSQp4te/k1PQ/hYq6byT+3pvaQJXBvjnkregxfv7JZAg90pwkiNpJbe7NDo5bB1zzjgj/Js/qd9gECOylSXdBrK2XxBfpVU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=l6cnAa0a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="l6cnAa0a" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBC101F00893; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 10:30:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789554659; bh=Fmnr5/uLooqS/bMx64dP7eD2bGWt7k9KQuKfroU6rHE=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=l6cnAa0aiCoTjAionrqVVA/hr8u1j6Bmvr3eKrdGXALmvXhb74KaaAlHE7Z3q1FYE 8PATwhrc/j1bB1F4uarHZkonOznndDJWvYFw83VYvueP7K7VJhLhU7XcIznP5MRpJo lPrzahY5xRRSds59RgxtX2435BAoGzLasUQKOysTKhg/7MoaEWS/eZ/eYM3O6p+0x8 JRnV1gwaDdjahBcHx+1hT0/tauzOW2R/SPbHUqfZV2Ll0YTIovY9RKRq3vaWToRxQM ixt8Z2G4ZzHqMTSpssWoF5eFWZKphGjLH9s916mN7JresUSJRDfU9F7eXmVQSQOiy3 G5HMDspPrOnfQ== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Drop redundant tcp_rate_check_app_limited calls From: Geliang Tang To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: John Fastabend , Jakub Sitnicki , Jiayuan Chen , Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Sabrina Dubroca , David Howells , Matthieu Baerts , Mat Martineau , Geliang Tang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:30:51 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20260915160125.29be79e7@kernel.org> References: <20260915160125.29be79e7@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2-9 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Jakub, On Tue, 2026-09-15 at 16:01 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 15:14:21 +0800 Geliang Tang wrote: > >   bpf: drop duplicate check_app_limited in tcp_bpf_push > >   tls: drop duplicate check_app_limited in tls_push_sg > > you can't have 2 patches in one series targeting different trees Right, my bad. I'll send them as two separate patches in v3, each to its own tree. Thanks, -Geliang