From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E638305958; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.246 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761212170; cv=none; b=Uc1o37BB29C8DAax/o25J+1gncZtV/hwOKSVFF/qqXSkz76T1wuKD6TBQlZGtUikk5G8VU0KdeEFigdTUCaYKFYjnqKZFmEKLFp4L+67s06jn5q1+A7/575QdYgQBWnhtMPoxTkYaxklD22P8nodxD/2QZvMIU+Hxp3GD8ytEsw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761212170; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uaaZDfd4Say4JVMfDA27XBtucXGfQ5q02IxKNSXE4SA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=S7Bn4ZpUyq2emoDZkFId96o6Xf+/CQR0ibJ4L+QPnm3ARx8G/7Y/bXyn1VZWS6DmstUxGhhkGaPIMCCPF2AbPxUa6RUHn5LXLjKgBaMYncJtdnbOZuQKP33IwjFR2HFZ2tVE0k1kp+XDQmfovlp0EUtjWu8pVycG0aT6av/E3kY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=ycYUtHe8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.246 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="ycYUtHe8" Received: from lelvem-sh01.itg.ti.com ([10.180.77.71]) by fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 59N9Z46O495866; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:35:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1761212104; bh=3BZ/Pw5p7gUSP7C6Gq7z9L0Pemml3h4TZLYNOzw8Qhc=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ycYUtHe89cFtfiNd7ey6DVVPRMDmkAs6MWCSrsgUsC95kjqQ1Khj/QoZYRMzlQWYe OWBSfTgF9r5QvQwXvviTsfqfLg7U6o6gw+owt9LvLNNdtcr+oQrgQbBkA7RijWbS4d aCGVdMICWD7lKZblaBDoxtFInUJUIgiRNwUB+1Uc= Received: from DFLE203.ent.ti.com (dfle203.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.61]) by lelvem-sh01.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 59N9Z3XD2614512 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:35:03 -0500 Received: from DFLE215.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.73) by DFLE203.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:35:03 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.9) by DFLE215.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:35:03 -0500 Received: from [172.24.18.185] (lt9560gk3.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.18.185]) by lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 59N9Yua52645085; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:34:56 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:04:55 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] Add AF_XDP zero copy support To: Jakub Kicinski CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Vignesh Raghavendra , Roger Quadros , References: <20251014105613.2808674-1-m-malladi@ti.com> <20251020174308.59b87130@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: "Malladi, Meghana" In-Reply-To: <20251020174308.59b87130@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea On 10/21/2025 6:13 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:26:06 +0530 Meghana Malladi wrote: >> This series adds AF_XDP zero coppy support to icssg driver. >> >> Tests were performed on AM64x-EVM with xdpsock application [1]. >> >> A clear improvement is seen Transmit (txonly) and receive (rxdrop) >> for 64 byte packets. 1500 byte test seems to be limited by line >> rate (1G link) so no improvement seen there in packet rate >> >> Having some issue with l2fwd as the benchmarking numbers show 0 >> for 64 byte packets after forwading first batch packets and I am >> currently looking into it. > > This series stopped applying, could you please respin? Yes, Thanks for the heads up. -- Thanks, Meghana Malladi