bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] bpf: Specify access type of bpf_sysctl_get_name args
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:41:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8ecfb2d-c82f-4785-b5dd-eccec0d13f8a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610091933.717824-2-jmarchan@redhat.com>



On 6/10/25 2:19 AM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> The second argument of bpf_sysctl_get_name() helper is a pointer to a
> buffer that is being written to. However that isn't specify in the
> prototype.
>
> Until commit 37cce22dbd51a ("bpf: verifier: Refactor helper access
> type tracking"), all helper accesses were considered as a possible
> write access by the verifier, so no big harm was done. However, since
> then, the verifier might make wrong asssumption about the content of
> that address which might lead it to make faulty optimizations (such as
> removing code that was wrongly labeled dead). This is what happens in
> test_sysctl selftest to the tests related to sysctl_get_name.
>
> Add MEM_WRITE flag the second argument of bpf_sysctl_get_name().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-27 16:54 [PATCH] bpf: Specify access type of bpf_sysctl_get_name args Jerome Marchand
2025-05-27 19:56 ` Yonghong Song
2025-05-28  9:09   ` Jerome Marchand
2025-05-28 17:41     ` Yonghong Song
2025-05-27 21:39 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-28 12:47   ` Jerome Marchand
2025-05-28 16:41     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-29 11:35       ` Jerome Marchand
2025-06-10  9:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Jerome Marchand
2025-06-10  9:19   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jerome Marchand
2025-06-10 16:41     ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-06-10  9:19   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Convert test_sysctl to prog_tests Jerome Marchand
2025-06-10 17:16     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8ecfb2d-c82f-4785-b5dd-eccec0d13f8a@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).