From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF800C10F0E for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F72220883 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="S7Ip6ig7" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726486AbfDIQ5f (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:57:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:46351 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726372AbfDIQ5f (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:57:35 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 9so10047566pfj.13; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 09:57:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T5FuZxi6v+QW32ToObv1qgsnb20Q55Rzgr2gRwAN80k=; b=S7Ip6ig7xH3SOtgBq91WYfJYm7tbp98i7wCZAIOTvRkMe8KoeuGsGbnZWsh5ajyjfa ojDM35wJ3bdLbt4EqQQxp+0TH9rc1IcKcND6FF6ZxtalHedFEax4bQfWe57Jbk91j8xs KTXQbG/UD9cXFk3PAi2aPwam28TnMtLWrJ4vpYrlBzPm0dF6a3JNGqkXIneUGzqWMgvz hUahV+0gJWW7ObvE5ZEWVzElk+AlO/I8yhGMTllkLK2kVokcdnxoNIIIaKGgrFj/CyH2 6I68DR2UJhQLd3tKQt927cxyD1X9iIERFXosed8SP5Ip1wvrrTuTS2F8qV+hAxFECjAo Murw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T5FuZxi6v+QW32ToObv1qgsnb20Q55Rzgr2gRwAN80k=; b=cd51SHPW4ePLiov+/QTbQWl0zw9f95YrGk7E1GwQhElT5fPBV7pxa/0e94w2Cms+oe HeS+g6czBSrVJzHGWGoNLm5xn+tYfzoThy7h0YnsWTfyfakowQWDDXxI2HT0VcwZoWyU dzbW+E6+vkRG14NxOWTNBPi+H9PiImhSlgDWjZ6h3rLt/AbzLtDVaEpAsjm/qpxXA+Km DuLc46gYrXnJonUFXKwIdVxjjfscjXdEY5EgiVMZzAkQIBc3hvCjiheSJGFpcH6EUDL2 R+znKlLwtrHLMXzroXnzu6AyqrIYYeil+q/0toDERG1cTxnGx8lPNQD8eV/1sO8pZTQm jQ7g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2rurblgqckkgLtGgnLMLdY+z0ZQ+QIiLd1Dog9OFJtqChb0vp RJMwb9K4sC5Fmk+asqkztsQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyqtdYISfBYFUvW9+Zt80yyDMCbRb+nJ/GYFLp7lGlwDOS7ecxYMeeiunH5hoOHFPcZiPLs/A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2c3:: with SMTP id 186mr34860297pgc.161.1554829054170; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 09:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.40.10.243] (fw.cumulusnetworks.com. [216.129.126.126]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm21011543pfc.132.2019.04.09.09.57.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2019 09:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests: bpf: add VRF test cases to lwt_ip_encap test. To: Daniel Borkmann , Peter Oskolkov , Alexei Starovoitov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Oskolkov References: <20190403154338.29990-1-posk@google.com> <89f72dd4-a3d8-3788-482b-578e18b7078d@gmail.com> <07f9be8a-7856-8b68-f085-b72c0e880a05@iogearbox.net> From: David Ahern Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:57:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <07f9be8a-7856-8b68-f085-b72c0e880a05@iogearbox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On 4/9/19 2:48 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 04/05/2019 04:32 AM, David Ahern wrote: >> On 4/3/19 9:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote: >>> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT >>> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov >>> --- >>> .../selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh | 134 +++++++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) >>> >> >> I hit a wall with running this script. One problem is the different >> versions of nc for debian (stretch to be specific), and another problem >> is commands failing it is hard to figure out why (e.g., connect failures >> which seem like route lookup problems). I have been adding run_cmd and >> PAUSE_ON_FAIL options similar to what is in fib_tests.sh and the change >> I sent for pmtu.sh, but I have not finished. >> >> I am traveling tomorrow and not sure how much time I'll get this weekend >> to come back to this. Might be early next week. > > Hi David, any progress on the above? not yet.