From: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
To: Liu Jing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpftool: optimize if statement code
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:11:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe9261d8-1e1d-4060-9a7e-1902d75cff7a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241015110944.6975-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
2024-10-15 19:09 UTC+0800 ~ Liu Jing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Since both conditions are used to check whether len is valid, we can combine the two conditions into a single if statement
> Signed-off-by: Liu Jing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> index 4dbc4fcdf473..0121e0fd6949 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,9 @@ static int get_vendor_id(int ifindex)
>
> len = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
> close(fd);
> - if (len < 0)
> - return -1;
> - if (len >= (ssize_t)sizeof(buf))
> + if ((len < 0) || (len >= (ssize_t)sizeof(buf)))
> return -1;
> +
> buf[len] = '\0';
>
> return strtol(buf, NULL, 0);
Thanks. I'm not strictly opposed to the change, but it doesn't bring
much value in my opinion. I don't think this will "optimize" the
statement beyond what the compiler does already.
Quentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 11:09 [PATCH] bpftool: optimize if statement code Liu Jing
2024-10-15 12:11 ` Quentin Monnet [this message]
2024-10-15 18:16 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe9261d8-1e1d-4060-9a7e-1902d75cff7a@kernel.org \
--to=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox