From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
dsahern@kernel.org, makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:56:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff5e6185-0dcb-4879-8031-bdb0b0edcec6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411124553.GD395307@horms.kernel.org>
On 11/04/2025 14.45, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 05:31:19PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> In production, we're seeing TX drops on veth devices when the ptr_ring
>> fills up. This can occur when NAPI mode is enabled, though it's
>> relatively rare. However, with threaded NAPI - which we use in
>> production - the drops become significantly more frequent.
>>
>> The underlying issue is that with threaded NAPI, the consumer often runs
>> on a different CPU than the producer. This increases the likelihood of
>> the ring filling up before the consumer gets scheduled, especially under
>> load, leading to drops in veth_xmit() (ndo_start_xmit()).
>>
>> This patch introduces backpressure by returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY when the
>> ring is full, signaling the qdisc layer to requeue the packet. The txq
>> (netdev queue) is stopped in this condition and restarted once
>> veth_poll() drains entries from the ring, ensuring coordination between
>> NAPI and qdisc.
>>
>> Backpressure is only enabled when a qdisc is attached. Without a qdisc,
>> the driver retains its original behavior - dropping packets immediately
>> when the ring is full. This avoids unexpected behavior changes in setups
>> without a configured qdisc.
>>
>> With a qdisc in place (e.g. fq, sfq) this allows Active Queue Management
>> (AQM) to fairly schedule packets across flows and reduce collateral
>> damage from elephant flows.
>>
>> A known limitation of this approach is that the full ring sits in front
>> of the qdisc layer, effectively forming a FIFO buffer that introduces
>> base latency. While AQM still improves fairness and mitigates flow
>> dominance, the latency impact is measurable.
>>
>> In hardware drivers, this issue is typically addressed using BQL (Byte
>> Queue Limits), which tracks in-flight bytes needed based on physical link
>> rate. However, for virtual drivers like veth, there is no fixed bandwidth
>> constraint - the bottleneck is CPU availability and the scheduler's ability
>> to run the NAPI thread. It is unclear how effective BQL would be in this
>> context.
>>
>> This patch serves as a first step toward addressing TX drops. Future work
>> may explore adapting a BQL-like mechanism to better suit virtual devices
>> like veth.
>>
>> Reported-by: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks Jesper,
>
> It's very nice to see backpressure support being added here.
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -874,9 +909,16 @@ static int veth_xdp_rcv(struct veth_rq *rq, int budget,
>> struct veth_xdp_tx_bq *bq,
>> struct veth_stats *stats)
>> {
>> + struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(rq->dev);
>> + int queue_idx = rq->xdp_rxq.queue_index;
>> + struct netdev_queue *peer_txq;
>> + struct net_device *peer_dev;
>> int i, done = 0, n_xdpf = 0;
>> void *xdpf[VETH_XDP_BATCH];
>>
>> + peer_dev = priv->peer;
>
> I think you need to take into account RCU here.
>
> Sparse says:
>
> .../veth.c:919:18: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
> .../veth.c:919:18: expected struct net_device *peer_dev
> .../veth.c:919:18: got struct net_device [noderef] __rcu *peer
>
Is it correctly understood that I need an:
peer_dev = rcu_dereference(priv->peer);
And also wrap this in a RCU section (rcu_read_lock()) ?
>
>> + peer_txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(peer_dev, queue_idx);
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < budget; i++) {
>> void *ptr = __ptr_ring_consume(&rq->xdp_ring);
>>
>
> ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-11 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 15:31 [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] veth: qdisc backpressure and qdisc check refactor Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-11 12:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11 13:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2025-04-11 14:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 2/2] net: sched: generalize check for no-op qdisc Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-08 15:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-04-09 13:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-09 13:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-04-11 12:48 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11 12:59 ` [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] veth: qdisc backpressure and qdisc check refactor Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff5e6185-0dcb-4879-8031-bdb0b0edcec6@kernel.org \
--to=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).