public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	 Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	 KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	 Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,  Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	 Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>,
	 Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,  Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 64 bit division instruction
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:29:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mb61po7if3b0w.fsf@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPein8oS5egqGwzp@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Tue, 5 Sep 2023 22:50:23 +0100")

On Tue, Sep 05 2023, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 09:06:19PM +0000, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
>> +cont:
>> +
>> +	/* Call appropriate function */
>> +	if (sign)
>> +		emit_mov_i(ARM_IP, op == BPF_DIV ? (u32)jit_sdiv64 : (u32)jit_smod64, ctx);
>> +	else
>> +		emit_mov_i(ARM_IP, op == BPF_DIV ? (u32)jit_udiv64 : (u32)jit_mod64, ctx);
>
> Same comment as the previous patch here.

Will fix both in next version.

>
>> +
>> +	emit_blx_r(ARM_IP, ctx);
>> +
>> +	/* Save return value */
>> +	if (rd[1] != ARM_R0) {
>> +		emit(ARM_MOV_R(rd[0], ARM_R1), ctx);
>> +		emit(ARM_MOV_R(rd[1], ARM_R0), ctx);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Recover {R1, R0} from stack if it is not Rd */
>> +	if (rd[1] != ARM_R0)
>> +		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx);
>> +	else
>> +		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx);
>> +
>> +	/* Recover {R3, R2} from stack if it is not Rd */
>> +	if (rd[1] != ARM_R2)
>> +		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx);
>> +	else
>> +		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx);
>
> 	if (rd[1] != ARM_R0) {
> 		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx);
> 		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx);
> 	} else if (rd[1] != ARM_R2) {
> 		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx);
> 		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx);
> 	} else {
> 		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 16), ctx);
> 	}
>
> Hmm?

Actually, there can also be a situation where rd[1] != ARM_R0 && rd[1] != ARM_R2,
so should I do it like:

 	if (rd[1] != ARM_R0 && rd[1] != ARM_R2) {
 		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx);      
 	} else if (rd[1] != ARM_R0) {
 		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1)), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx);
 	} else if (rd[1] != ARM_R2) {
 		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 8), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_POP(BIT(ARM_R2) | BIT(ARM_R3)), ctx);
 	} else {
 		emit(ARM_ADD_I(ARM_SP, ARM_SP, 16), ctx);
 	}

Thanks,
Puranjay

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-06  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-05 21:06 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] arm32, bpf: add support for cpuv4 insns Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 32-bit offset jmp instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:11   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] arm32, bpf: add support for sign-extension load instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:24   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 11:47     ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] arm32, bpf: add support for sign-extension mov instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] arm32, bpf: add support for unconditional bswap instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:32   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06  9:31     ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 32-bit signed division Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:44   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 64 bit division instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:50   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06  9:29     ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2023-09-06 18:56       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 19:19         ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-06 20:26           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] selftest, bpf: enable cpu v4 tests for arm32 Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-05 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions Puranjay Mohan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mb61po7if3b0w.fsf@amazon.com \
    --to=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox