BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhen Ni" <zhen.ni@easystack.cn>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_owner: extract page_owner_next_eligible() from read loop
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:35:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-165395@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009112308.240769-2-zhen.ni@easystack.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm: soft lockup in page_owner_next_eligible() due to missing cond_resched()
--

commit 303a10c305ed333982228df86334f12bd6d8a3c2
Author: Zhen Ni <zhen.ni@easystack.cn>

mm/page_owner: extract page_owner_next_eligible() from read loop

This commit extracts the page scanning logic from read_page_owner() into a
dedicated helper, page_owner_next_eligible(). It advances a cursor to the
next eligible page and takes a snapshot of the page_owner record inside the
page_ext RCU window.

> diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
> index fbbda7ba914ba..bafe474f33602 100644
> --- a/mm/page_owner.c
> +++ b/mm/page_owner.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -798,37 +795,67 @@ read_page_owner(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>  			goto ext_put_continue;
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Access to page_ext->handle isn't synchronous so we should
> -		 * be careful to access it.
> +		 * Take a snapshot of the page_owner record inside the RCU
> +		 * window, then validate it, so that print_page_owner()
> +		 * reads the checked handle from the same snapshot.
>  		 */
> -		handle = READ_ONCE(page_owner->handle);
> -		if (!handle)
> -			goto ext_put_continue;
> +		scan->pfn = pfn;
> +		scan->page = page;
> +		scan->po_snap = *page_owner;
> +		page_ext_put(page_ext);
>  
> +		if (!scan->po_snap.handle)
> +			continue;

[Severity: High]
Could this cause a soft lockup? By using a continue statement here in
page_owner_next_eligible(), we jump directly to the next loop iteration
(advancing pfn) without executing cond_resched() at the end of the loop
block.

If a large contiguous sequence of allocated pages lacks stack handles
(e.g., if stack depot is exhausted or during early non-tracked allocations),
the kernel could iterate over millions of pages without yielding.

The original implementation used goto ext_put_continue; which correctly
yielded. Does this need to be updated to explicitly yield or use the
goto instead?

> +
> +		return true;
> +
> +ext_put_continue:
> +		page_ext_put(page_ext);
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009112308.240769-1-zhen.ni@easystack.cn?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09 11:23 [PATCH 0/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_iter and kfuncs Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_iter target "page_owner" Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 11:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  6:28     ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_owner: add open-coded page_owner iterator Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  6:41     ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_page_owner_get_nid() kfunc Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  7:01     ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_page_owner_get_memcg_info() kfunc Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  7:09     ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/bpf: add tests for the page_owner bpf_iter target Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  7:15     ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 13:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
     [not found] ` <20261009112308.240769-2-zhen.ni@easystack.cn>
2026-10-09 11:35   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-10  9:40     ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_owner: extract page_owner_next_eligible() from read loop zhen.ni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-165395@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhen.ni@easystack.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox