From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhen Ni" <zhen.ni@easystack.cn>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_owner: extract page_owner_next_eligible() from read loop
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:35:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-165395@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009112308.240769-2-zhen.ni@easystack.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm: soft lockup in page_owner_next_eligible() due to missing cond_resched()
--
commit 303a10c305ed333982228df86334f12bd6d8a3c2
Author: Zhen Ni <zhen.ni@easystack.cn>
mm/page_owner: extract page_owner_next_eligible() from read loop
This commit extracts the page scanning logic from read_page_owner() into a
dedicated helper, page_owner_next_eligible(). It advances a cursor to the
next eligible page and takes a snapshot of the page_owner record inside the
page_ext RCU window.
> diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
> index fbbda7ba914ba..bafe474f33602 100644
> --- a/mm/page_owner.c
> +++ b/mm/page_owner.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -798,37 +795,67 @@ read_page_owner(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> goto ext_put_continue;
>
> /*
> - * Access to page_ext->handle isn't synchronous so we should
> - * be careful to access it.
> + * Take a snapshot of the page_owner record inside the RCU
> + * window, then validate it, so that print_page_owner()
> + * reads the checked handle from the same snapshot.
> */
> - handle = READ_ONCE(page_owner->handle);
> - if (!handle)
> - goto ext_put_continue;
> + scan->pfn = pfn;
> + scan->page = page;
> + scan->po_snap = *page_owner;
> + page_ext_put(page_ext);
>
> + if (!scan->po_snap.handle)
> + continue;
[Severity: High]
Could this cause a soft lockup? By using a continue statement here in
page_owner_next_eligible(), we jump directly to the next loop iteration
(advancing pfn) without executing cond_resched() at the end of the loop
block.
If a large contiguous sequence of allocated pages lacks stack handles
(e.g., if stack depot is exhausted or during early non-tracked allocations),
the kernel could iterate over millions of pages without yielding.
The original implementation used goto ext_put_continue; which correctly
yielded. Does this need to be updated to explicitly yield or use the
goto instead?
> +
> + return true;
> +
> +ext_put_continue:
> + page_ext_put(page_ext);
> + cond_resched();
> + }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009112308.240769-1-zhen.ni@easystack.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 11:23 [PATCH 0/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_iter and kfuncs Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_iter target "page_owner" Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 11:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 6:28 ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_owner: add open-coded page_owner iterator Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 6:41 ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_page_owner_get_nid() kfunc Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 7:01 ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_owner: add bpf_page_owner_get_memcg_info() kfunc Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 7:09 ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 11:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/bpf: add tests for the page_owner bpf_iter target Zhen Ni
2026-10-09 12:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 7:15 ` zhen.ni
2026-10-09 13:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
[not found] ` <20261009112308.240769-2-zhen.ni@easystack.cn>
2026-10-09 11:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-10 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_owner: extract page_owner_next_eligible() from read loop zhen.ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-165395@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhen.ni@easystack.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox