From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Justin Suess" <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: add a path ancestor iterator
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:11:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170194@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013164800.2906577-6-utilityemal77@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] bpf: deadlock in bpf_iter_path_ancestors_next due to GFP_KERNEL under VFS locks
--
commit 0d24b2f0561971ff2a9d89456692d9ec1ea13279
Author: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
bpf: add a path ancestor iterator
This commit introduces a sleepable BPF iterator for evaluating a path's
ancestry using the stepwise vfs_walk_ancestors() engine. It adds kfuncs
to manage the iterator and hands each position to the program as an
acquired reference by allocating a copy of the path structure.
> diff --git a/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c b/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
> index 08f0847c49708..02398f5a46d5a 100644
> --- a/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
> +++ b/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
[ ... ]
> +__bpf_kfunc struct path *
> +bpf_iter_path_ancestors_next(struct bpf_iter_path_ancestors *it)
> +{
> + struct bpf_path_ancestors_kern *kit = (void *)it;
> + struct path *pos = bpf_path_ancestors_step(kit);
> + struct path *held;
> +
> + if (!pos)
> + return NULL;
> + /*
> + * The position must outlive the walk's own view of it, so it gets a
> + * reference and a struct path of its own to live in: struct path is
> + * a value type, with nothing a BPF reference could be taken on
> + * otherwise. Sleepable, so no atomic allocation.
> + */
> + held = kmalloc_obj(*held);
[Severity: High]
Can this allocation cause a deadlock if the iterator is used from a sleepable
LSM hook?
If a sleepable BPF LSM program is attached to a hook like
security_inode_setattr or security_inode_unlink, it is called by the VFS
with the inode's i_rwsem held.
The kmalloc_obj() macro appears to default to GFP_KERNEL allocations, which
includes the __GFP_FS flag. Under memory pressure, this could trigger direct
memory reclaim.
If reclaim attempts to write back dirty pages or shrink the dcache/icache,
it might try to acquire the same i_rwsem, resulting in a deadlock.
> + if (!held) {
> + kit->step = -ENOMEM;
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + *held = *pos;
> + path_get(held);
> + return held;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013164800.2906577-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 16:47 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] fs: unified VFS ancestor walk for Landlock and BPF Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] namei: introduce __path_walk_parent() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] namei: add vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] landlock: convert ancestor walk to vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] namei: expose the stepwise ancestor walk to fs/ Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: add a path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 18:00 ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 19:50 ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] fs: add mnt_undo_legitimize() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] namei: add an rcu-walk mode to the ancestor walk Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:56 ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] bpf: support "__uninit" iterator arguments in generic kfuncs Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] bpf: add a lockless path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:50 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170194@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox