From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: free the policies if a socket's clone fails late
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 01:39:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-175874@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261017013912.396296-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] net: xfrm policy leak in sk_clone() when xfrm_sk_clone_policy() fails
--
commit a4aae636f8ebbd9f602d754c2bcb096a55363b3d
Author: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
net: free the policies if a socket's clone fails late
This commit calls xfrm_sk_free_policy() in sk_clone() when
bpf_sk_storage_clone() fails so that cloned IPsec socket policies are not
leaked when freeing the new socket.
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 1302c1e848b2a..cdbd49ff71b0a 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -2578,8 +2578,10 @@ struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority,
> goto free;
> }
>
> - if (bpf_sk_storage_clone(sk, newsk))
> + if (bpf_sk_storage_clone(sk, newsk)) {
> + xfrm_sk_free_policy(newsk);
> goto free;
> + }
>
> /* Clear sk_user_data if parent had the pointer tagged
> * as not suitable for copying when cloning.
[Severity: Medium]
Can newsk->sk_policy[0] still leak if xfrm_sk_clone_policy() fails on the
second policy?
In net/core/sock.c:sk_clone(), just above this block:
if (unlikely(!is_charged || xfrm_sk_clone_policy(newsk, sk))) {
if (!is_charged)
RCU_INIT_POINTER(newsk->sk_filter, NULL);
goto free;
}
When is_charged is true and the parent socket has both sk_policy[0] and
sk_policy[1] installed, xfrm_sk_clone_policy() clears newsk->sk_policy[0..1]
and calls __xfrm_sk_clone_policy():
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:__xfrm_sk_clone_policy() {
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
p = rcu_dereference(osk->sk_policy[i]);
if (p) {
np = clone_policy(p, i);
if (unlikely(!np)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
rcu_assign_pointer(sk->sk_policy[i], np);
}
}
}
If clone_policy(p, 0) succeeds (allocating the policy, linking it into
net->xfrm.policy_all, and incrementing net->xfrm.policy_count[XFRM_POLICY_MAX])
and clone_policy(p, 1) then fails, __xfrm_sk_clone_policy() returns -ENOMEM
with newsk->sk_policy[0] still populated.
Because sk_clone() jumps directly to free without calling
xfrm_sk_free_policy(newsk) on that path, wouldn't newsk->sk_policy[0] still
be leaked?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261017013912.396296-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 1:39 [PATCH net] net: free the policies if a socket's clone fails late Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-17 1:44 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-17 4:04 ` kuniyu
2026-10-18 1:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-18 2:15 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-18 15:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-175874@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox