From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 4/5] net: stmmac: fix VLAN tag stripping on non-linear RX frames
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:07:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-177997@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261018-stmmac-rx-mb-v8-4-5f58c0b25849@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] net: stmmac: unconditional VLAN_ETH_HLEN pull in stmmac_rx_vlan()
--
commit 0a2d776ad3e3751ad20c9dd1144b0c000e67acc1
Author: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
net: stmmac: fix VLAN tag stripping on non-linear RX frames
This commit updates stmmac_rx_vlan() to linearize the VLAN header with
pskb_may_pull(), preserve XDP metadata when popping the VLAN tag, and drop
the frame in stmmac_rx() and stmmac_dispatch_skb_zc() if pulling fails.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index e929cc0f23125..04dc6dcaa435d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -5095,22 +5095,30 @@ static netdev_features_t stmmac_features_check(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return vlan_features_check(skb, features);
> }
>
> -static void stmmac_rx_vlan(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int stmmac_rx_vlan(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> - struct vlan_ethhdr *veth = skb_vlan_eth_hdr(skb);
> - __be16 vlan_proto = veth->h_vlan_proto;
> - u16 vlanid;
> + struct vlan_ethhdr *veth;
>
> - if ((vlan_proto == htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + veth = skb_vlan_eth_hdr(skb);
> + if ((veth->h_vlan_proto == htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX) ||
> - (vlan_proto == htons(ETH_P_8021AD) &&
> + (veth->h_vlan_proto == htons(ETH_P_8021AD) &&
> dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_RX)) {
[Severity: Medium]
Can calling pskb_may_pull(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN) unconditionally at the start
of stmmac_rx_vlan() cause valid untagged frames to be dropped, or force
unnecessary fragment pulls on non-linear untagged packets?
When priv->hw->hw_vlan_en is false, stmmac_rx() and stmmac_dispatch_skb_zc()
call stmmac_rx_vlan() on every received frame, even when VLAN RX stripping
offloads are disabled in dev->features or the packet is untagged.
XDP helpers such as bpf_xdp_adjust_head(), bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(), and
bpf_xdp_frags_shrink_tail() allow shrinking a frame down to ETH_HLEN (14
bytes):
net/core/filter.c:bpf_xdp_adjust_head() {
...
if (unlikely(data < data_start ||
data > xdp->data_end - ETH_HLEN))
return -EINVAL;
...
}
For an untagged frame of 14 to 17 bytes (where ETH_HLEN <= skb->len <
VLAN_ETH_HLEN), pskb_may_pull(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN) fails and returns -EINVAL,
causing both stmmac_rx() and stmmac_dispatch_skb_zc() to free and drop the
skb via dev_kfree_skb_any(skb).
Additionally, for non-linear untagged frames with skb->len >= VLAN_ETH_HLEN
whose linear head is ETH_HLEN bytes (for example, after bpf_xdp_adjust_head()
with BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS, or with GMAC4 split header mode splitting after the
14-byte L2 header), pulling VLAN_ETH_HLEN before checking h_vlan_proto forces
__pskb_pull_tail() on every untagged packet.
Since veth->h_vlan_proto sits within the first ETH_HLEN bytes of the header,
should stmmac_rx_vlan() only pull ETH_HLEN initially (or check dev->features
first), and defer pskb_may_pull(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN) and reloading veth until
after confirming that veth->h_vlan_proto matches a VLAN ethertype to be
stripped?
> + __be16 vlan_proto = veth->h_vlan_proto;
> + u16 vlanid = ntohs(veth->h_vlan_TCI);
> + u8 meta_len = skb_metadata_len(skb);
> +
> /* pop the vlan tag */
> - vlanid = ntohs(veth->h_vlan_TCI);
> - memmove(skb->data + VLAN_HLEN, veth, ETH_ALEN * 2);
> + memmove(skb->data - meta_len + VLAN_HLEN,
> + skb->data - meta_len, meta_len + ETH_ALEN * 2);
> skb_pull(skb, VLAN_HLEN);
> __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, vlan_proto, vlanid);
> }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -5530,12 +5538,15 @@ static void stmmac_dispatch_skb_zc(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 queue,
> }
>
> stmmac_get_rx_hwtstamp(priv, p, np, skb);
> - if (priv->hw->hw_vlan_en)
> + if (priv->hw->hw_vlan_en) {
> /* MAC level stripping. */
> stmmac_rx_hw_vlan(priv, priv->hw, p, skb);
> - else
> - /* Driver level stripping. */
> - stmmac_rx_vlan(priv->dev, skb);
> + } else if (stmmac_rx_vlan(priv->dev, skb)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + priv->xstats.rx_dropped++;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, priv->dev);
>
> if (unlikely(!coe) || !stmmac_has_ip_ethertype(skb))
> @@ -6041,12 +6052,14 @@ static int stmmac_rx(struct stmmac_priv *priv, int limit, u32 queue)
>
> stmmac_get_rx_hwtstamp(priv, p, np, skb);
>
> - if (priv->hw->hw_vlan_en)
> + if (priv->hw->hw_vlan_en) {
> /* MAC level stripping. */
> stmmac_rx_hw_vlan(priv, priv->hw, p, skb);
> - else
> - /* Driver level stripping. */
> - stmmac_rx_vlan(priv->dev, skb);
> + } else if (stmmac_rx_vlan(priv->dev, skb)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + rx_dropped++;
> + goto next;
> + }
>
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, priv->dev);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261018-stmmac-rx-mb-v8-0-5f58c0b25849@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 17:06 [PATCH net-next v8 0/5] net: stmmac: introduce XDP rx multi-buff support Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-18 17:06 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/5] net: stmmac: take ownership of saved RX state at poll entry Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 17:38 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-18 17:07 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/5] net: stmmac: drop split frames on AF_XDP zero-copy RX Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 11:16 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-19 12:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 12:30 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-19 17:38 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-18 17:07 ` [PATCH net-next v8 3/5] net: stmmac: drop multi-buffer frames in XDP mode Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 11:08 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-19 17:38 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-18 17:07 ` [PATCH net-next v8 4/5] net: stmmac: fix VLAN tag stripping on non-linear RX frames Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 11:08 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-19 17:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-19 17:38 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-18 17:07 ` [PATCH net-next v8 5/5] net: stmmac: rework stmmac_rx to support XDP rx multi-buff Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 11:10 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-19 17:38 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-18 17:08 ` [PATCH net-next v8 0/5] net: stmmac: introduce XDP rx multi-buff support netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-18 17:19 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-177997@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox