From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xu Kuohai" <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 14/16] selftests/bpf: Add test for arena percpu-only object
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:12:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-179095@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7f725d0057be520ec5fb417f3f7d3a1e2c765fe.1792503001.git.xukuohai@huawei.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] selftests/bpf: mismatch between __arena_percpu addr_space_cast and verifier
--
commit 978ace4d7c1590716d35b8badc4a0e110474bd79
Author: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
selftests/bpf: Add test for arena percpu-only object
This commit adds the __arena_percpu macro to bpf_arena_common.h along with a
selftest for an object containing only an arena per-cpu variable.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h
> index 82aafe879fae2..7cdee141764e7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h
> @@ -35,11 +35,13 @@
> #if defined(__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST) && !defined(BPF_ARENA_FORCE_ASM)
> #define __arena __attribute__((address_space(1))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("arena")))
> #define __arena_global __attribute__((address_space(1)))
> +#define __arena_percpu __attribute__((address_space(1))) __attribute__((section(".arena.percpu")))
> #define cast_kern(ptr) /* nop for bpf prog. emitted by LLVM */
> #define cast_user(ptr) /* nop for bpf prog. emitted by LLVM */
> #else
> #define __arena __attribute__((btf_type_tag("arena")))
> #define __arena_global SEC(".addr_space.1")
> +#define __arena_percpu SEC(".arena.percpu")
> #define cast_kern(ptr) bpf_addr_space_cast(ptr, 0, 1)
> #define cast_user(ptr) bpf_addr_space_cast(ptr, 1, 0)
> #endif
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_percpu_only.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_percpu_only.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..35e4ff983e65d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_percpu_only.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Huawei Technologies Inc. */
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include "bpf_arena_common.h"
> +
> +struct {
> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARENA);
> + __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_MMAPABLE);
> +} arena SEC(".maps");
> +
> +__u64 __arena_percpu counter = 0x123456;
> +
> +SEC("syscall")
> +int arena_percpu_only_write(void *ctx)
> +{
> + counter = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
> + return 0;
> +}
[Severity: High]
How does __arena_percpu interact with the verifier and JITs across the two
branches in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h?
First, when compiled without __BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST (such as under
test_progs-bpf_gcc or when BPF_ARENA_FORCE_ASM is defined), __arena_percpu is
defined without address_space(1), and arena_percpu_only_write() assigns to
counter unconditionally without #ifdef __BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST or
cast_kern().
In that configuration, the compiler emits a BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW
instruction (relocated by libbpf to BPF_PSEUDO_ARENA_PERCPU) followed directly
by BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW without an rX = addr_space_cast(rX, 0, 1)
instruction. Unlike BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE on an arena map (which check_ld_imm()
marks as SCALAR_VALUE so the verifier rejects uncast dereferences),
check_ld_imm() in kernel/bpf/verifier.c marks BPF_PSEUDO_ARENA_PERCPU directly
as PTR_TO_ARENA, and bpf_convert_ctx_accesses() rewrites the store to
BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW.
However, check_and_resolve_insns() resolves the 64-bit immediate of
BPF_PSEUDO_ARENA_PERCPU to the full 64-bit arena->user_vm_start + off (with
insn[1].imm = addr >> 32), and the x86 and arm64 JITs load this full 64-bit
immediate and add smp_processor_id() * chunk_sz using 64-bit addition without
clearing the upper 32 bits. Without addr_space_cast(rX, 0, 1) (which
bpf_do_misc_fixups() rewrites to a 32-bit wX = wY move to zero the upper 32
bits), the upper 32 bits of the PTR_TO_ARENA register remain
user_vm_start >> 32. When test_arena_percpu_only() in
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/arena_percpu.c runs
arena_percpu_only_write(), BPF_PROBE_MEM32 adds the 64-bit kern_vm_start to
this 64-bit register, targeting kern_vm_start + user_vm_start + off +
cpu * chunk_sz outside the arena's 4 GiB kernel vmalloc area.
Second, when __BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST is defined, __arena_percpu has
__attribute__((address_space(1))), which causes Clang to emit
rX = addr_space_cast(rX, 0, 1) immediately after BPF_PSEUDO_ARENA_PERCPU. In
check_alu_op() in kernel/bpf/verifier.c, addr_space_cast calls
mark_reg_unknown() on dst_reg, which zeroes dst_reg->mem_size and resets the
chunk offset pos set by check_ld_imm():
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:check_alu_op() {
...
if (bpf_insn_is_addr_space_cast(insn)) {
...
/* convert from ptr_to_arena to scalar or vice versa */
mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
...
}
Doesn't this wipe out dst_reg->mem_size and bypass the per-cpu chunk bounds
check in check_mem_access()?
> +
> +char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
[ ... ]
>
>
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1792503001.git.xukuohai@huawei.com?part=14
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 13:22 [PATCH bpf-next 00/16] Add percpu variable support for bpf arena Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/16] libbpf: Collect arena percpu data section Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/16] libbpf: Create arena percpu chunk from the arena percpu ELF section Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/16] libbpf: Place the percpu chunks in the bpf arena Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/16] libbpf: Copy the percpu chunks into " Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/16] libbpf: Add the arena percpu chunk attribute to map creation options Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/16] libbpf: Relocate arena percpu access instructions Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/16] libbpf: Add arena percpu feature probe Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/16] bpf: Extend syscall to accept arena percpu information Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/16] bpf: Teach verifier about arena percpu instructions Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 14:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/16] bpf, x86: Add support for arena percpu Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/16] bpf, arm64: " Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 14:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/16] libbpf: Introduce arena percpu helpers for user space Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/16] bpftool: Emit the arena percpu datasec into skeleton Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/16] selftests/bpf: Add test for arena percpu-only object Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Add test for mixed arena percpu object Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/16] selftests/bpf: Add test for arena percpu bounds Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 14:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/16] Add percpu variable support for bpf arena Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-179095@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox