From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vineet Gupta" <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/12] [do not merge] bpf: Track low-32 scalar equality across narrowing stack spills
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:42:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-179371@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020161907.2115379-12-vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] bpf: zext_32_to_64() on 4-byte spill loses signed bounds on ldsx fill
--
commit b63f0039bbb8ede3ae56c9d69df1283e246bde61
Author: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
bpf: Track low-32 scalar equality across narrowing stack spills
This patch tracks low-32 scalar equality across 4-byte narrowing stack
spills by assigning a scalar ID, truncating the spilled slot with
zext_32_to_64(), and setting link_kind to BPF_REG_LINK_ZEXT.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 083b5bd70d3fa..de2a5c048a29a 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3927,15 +3928,46 @@ static int check_stack_write_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> mark_stack_slot_scratched(env, spi);
> if (reg && !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && env->bpf_capable) {
> bool reg_value_fits;
> + bool subreg_link;
>
> reg_value_fits = get_reg_width(reg) <= BITS_PER_BYTE * size;
> + /*
> + * A narrowing spill stores the low 32 bits of the source, so
> + * the slot is their zero-extension: record a low-32 link
> + * rather than dropping the relation, as a 32-bit mov does.
> + * A store never sign-extends, so there is only one link kind here.
> + */
> + subreg_link = !reg_value_fits && size == 4;
> +
> /* Make sure that reg had an ID to build a relation on spill. */
> - if (reg_value_fits)
> + if (reg_value_fits || subreg_link)
> assign_scalar_id_before_mov(env, reg);
> save_register_state(env, state, spi, reg, size);
> - /* Break the relation on a narrowing spill. */
> - if (!reg_value_fits)
> - bpf_clear_scalar_id(&ss->spilled_ptr);
> + if (!reg_value_fits) {
> + if (subreg_link && reg->id) {
> + /*
> + * save_register_state() copies the source
> + * whole, but the store only wrote its low 32
> + * bits, so truncate to those before recording
> + * the kind: a slot asserting BPF_REG_LINK_ZEXT
> + * over the source's wider bounds is a register
> + * state that contradicts itself.
> + *
> + * Keep the source's delta, though: the slot
> + * holds (u32)(base + delta), so resetting it to
> + * 0 would record a relation off by that delta.
> + */
> + zext_32_to_64(&ss->spilled_ptr);
> + ss->spilled_ptr.link_kind = BPF_REG_LINK_ZEXT;
[Severity: Medium]
Does calling zext_32_to_64() on ss->spilled_ptr cause a precision
regression when the 4-byte slot is subsequently filled by a sign-extending
load (ldsx)?
When spilling a scalar register whose signed range straddles zero (for
example [-10, 10], where reg_umax(reg) is U64_MAX and get_reg_width(reg)
is 64) with a 4-byte store (*(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = rX), subreg_link is true
and zext_32_to_64(&ss->spilled_ptr) is called:
static void zext_32_to_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
reg_step_check_unsigned(reg, 32);
reg->var_off = tnum_subreg(reg->var_off);
reg_set_urange64(reg, reg_u32_min(reg), reg_u32_max(reg));
}
Because r32 = [-10, 10] straddles zero in unsigned 32-bit arithmetic
(u32_min = 0, u32_max = 0xffffffff), zext_32_to_64() overwrites
ss->spilled_ptr.r64 with [0, 0xffffffff] while leaving [-10, 10] only in
r32.
If the slot is then reloaded with a sign-extending load (*(s32 *)(r10 - 8),
*(s16 *)(r10 - 8), or *(s8 *)(r10 - 8)), check_stack_read_fixed_off()
copies ss->spilled_ptr to the destination register and check_mem_access()
calls coerce_reg_to_size_sx():
static void coerce_reg_to_size_sx(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
{
...
/* If every value fits the signed N-bit range sign extension is a noop. */
if (reg_smin(reg) >= -limit && reg_smax(reg) < limit)
return;
Because coerce_reg_to_size_sx() inspects reg_smin(reg) and reg_smax(reg)
from r64 rather than r32, smax is 0xffffffff (>= limit), so the early
return no longer triggers and coerce_reg_to_size_sx() falls through to
set_sext64_default_val(), resetting both r64 and r32 to [S32_MIN, S32_MAX]
(or the full S16/S8 range).
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Nothing to relate: either the source has no
> + * id to share, or the store is narrower than
> + * the 32 bits a link can describe.
> + */
> + bpf_clear_scalar_id(&ss->spilled_ptr);
> + }
> + }
> } else if (!reg && !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && is_bpf_st_mem(insn) &&
> env->bpf_capable) {
> struct bpf_reg_state *tmp_reg = &env->fake_reg[0];
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261020161907.2115379-1-vineet.gupta@linux.dev?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 16:18 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/12] bpf: track scalar equality across the low 32 bits Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/12] bpf: Keep the 32-bit range across a sign extension that cannot change it Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/12] selftests/bpf: Cover sign extensions that cannot change the range Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/12] bpf: Prepare linked scalars for relations narrower than 64 bits Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 17:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/12] bpf: Track low-32 scalar equality across zero-extending movs Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 17:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/12] selftests/bpf: Cover the low-32 link for " Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/12] bpf: Track low-32 scalar equality across sign-extending movs Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/12] selftests/bpf: Cover the low-32 link for " Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/12] bpf: Recover the low 32 bits on the reverse link direction Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/12] bpf: Track low-32 scalar equality across narrowing stack fills Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/12] selftests/bpf: Cover the low-32 link for " Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 17:15 ` Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/12] [do not merge] bpf: Track low-32 scalar equality across narrowing stack spills Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-20 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/12] [do not merge] selftests/bpf: Cover the low-32 link for " Vineet Gupta
2026-10-20 16:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-179371@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox