From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Slawomir Stepien" <sst@poczta.fm>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf 1/3] xdp: introduce xdp_convert_skb_to_buff()
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 12:29:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-197255@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104121316.1155680-2-sst@poczta.fm>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] xdp: shared xdp_rxq.mem.type mutation in xdp_convert_skb_to_buff()
--
commit cc30acfe8407351451e1a0085dbc31d3b426757f
Author: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
xdp: introduce xdp_convert_skb_to_buff()
This commit introduces the xdp_convert_skb_to_buff() helper to initialize an
xdp_buff from an sk_buff for generic XDP and sets xdp->rxq->mem.type to
MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL so page_pool-backed fragments are properly released when
shrinking tail data.
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h
> index 07231adfb5f82..28bd78dbef207 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp.h
> @@ -389,6 +389,42 @@ struct sk_buff *xdp_build_skb_from_frame(struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
> struct net_device *dev);
> struct xdp_frame *xdpf_clone(struct xdp_frame *xdpf);
>
> +/**
> + * xdp_convert_skb_to_buff - build an xdp_buff on top of an skb
> + * @skb: skb to describe, packet data is taken from its MAC header onwards
> + * @xdp: xdp_buff to initialize
> + * @xdp_rxq: Rx queue info to attach to @xdp
> + *
> + * The memory type set on @xdp_rxq is only used to release fragments that
> + * the XDP program consumes; the head can not be freed from under the skb.
> + * A non-linear @skb is expected to have gone through skb_pp_cow_data(), so
> + * all of its fragments are page_pool backed.
> + */
> +static inline
> +void xdp_convert_skb_to_buff(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> + struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq)
> +{
> + u32 frame_sz, pkt_len;
> +
> + /* SKB "head" area always have tailroom for skb_shared_info */
> + frame_sz = skb_end_pointer(skb) - skb->head;
> + frame_sz += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> + pkt_len = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - skb_mac_header(skb);
> +
> + xdp_init_buff(xdp, frame_sz, xdp_rxq);
> + xdp_prepare_buff(xdp, skb->head, skb->mac_header, pkt_len, true);
> +
> + if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> + skb_shinfo(skb)->xdp_frags_size = skb->data_len;
> + xdp_buff_set_frags_flag(xdp);
> + } else {
> + xdp_buff_clear_frags_flag(xdp);
> + }
> +
> + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_is_nonlinear(skb) && !skb->pp_recycle);
> + xdp->rxq->mem.type = MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL;
> +}
[Severity: High]
Does mutating xdp->rxq->mem.type in place on the shared netdev_rx_queue::xdp_rxq
cause a regression for bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()?
In net/core/dev.c, bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp() looks up the persistent device
queue via netif_get_rxqueue(skb) and passes &rxqueue->xdp_rxq to
xdp_convert_skb_to_buff(), which permanently sets rxqueue->xdp_rxq.mem.type to
MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL.
In net/bpf/test_run.c, bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() (and xdp_convert_md_to_buff()
when ingress_ifindex is specified) attaches the device's &rxqueue->xdp_rxq
without resetting mem.type:
net/bpf/test_run.c:bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() {
...
rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev, 0);
rxqueue->xdp_rxq.frag_size = PAGE_SIZE;
xdp_init_buff(&xdp, rxqueue->xdp_rxq.frag_size, &rxqueue->xdp_rxq);
...
page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!page) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_put_dev;
}
frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags++];
data_len = min_t(u32, kattr->test.data_size_in - size,
PAGE_SIZE);
skb_frag_fill_page_desc(frag, page, 0, data_len);
...
}
When a multi-buffer BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN runs on that queue after (or concurrently
with) generic XDP and the program shrinks and releases a fragment via
bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() or bpf_xdp_pull_data(), the call chain is:
bpf_xdp_shrink_data()
-> __xdp_return(netmem, MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL, false, NULL)
-> page_pool_put_full_netmem()
-> page_pool_unref_netmem()
Because the fragment page in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() was allocated with
alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL) rather than a page_pool, atomic_long_sub_return() in
page_pool_unref_netmem() underflows pp_ref_count from 0 to -1, triggering
WARN_ON(ret < 0) and leaking the page since sinfo->nr_frags has already been
decremented. If the buddy page previously came from a page_pool where
page_pool_return_netmem() cleared page->pp to NULL while leaving
pp_ref_count == 1, page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem() will also dereference a NULL
pool pointer.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261104121316.1155680-1-sst@poczta.fm?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 12:13 [PATCH v6 bpf 0/3] xdp: fix page_pool leaks Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-04 12:13 ` [PATCH v6 bpf 1/3] xdp: introduce xdp_convert_skb_to_buff() Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-04 12:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 12:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-04 12:13 ` [PATCH v6 bpf 2/3] veth: use the frame mem type when running XDP on an xdp_frame Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-04 12:13 ` [PATCH v6 bpf 3/3] veth: update mem type in xdp_buff Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-04 12:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-04 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 bpf 0/3] xdp: fix page_pool leaks Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-05 8:17 ` Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-05 9:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-197255@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sst@poczta.fm \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox