From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Siddharth Nayyar" <sidnayyar@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: Implement bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem() for light skeletons
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 20:39:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-202249@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106-lskel-struct-ops-v1-5-a4486ffc79cb@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] libbpf: wrong prog_fd[] stack index in
bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem()
- [Low] libbpf: module BTF FD leak on error path in
bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem()
--
commit 54b2859f2dcde10dc15af7a3b316556b814dfd0e
Author: Siddharth Nayyar <sidnayyar@google.com>
libbpf: Implement bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem() for light skeletons
This commit adds bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem() and calls it from
bpf_object_prepare_struct_ops() to close attach_btf_obj_fd, copy callback
program file descriptors into kern_vdata, and emit the map update for
struct_ops maps in light skeletons.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c b/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c
> index aaa491463521a..6dcba83dcc098 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c
> @@ -1573,3 +1573,61 @@ void bpf_gen__init_kern_struct_ops(struct bpf_gen *gen, struct btf *btf,
> }
> }
> }
> +
> +void bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem(struct bpf_gen *gen, int map_idx,
> + struct btf *btf,
> + struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops)
> +{
> + int attr_size = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, flags);
> + const struct btf_type *type;
> + union bpf_attr attr;
> + int key, zero = 0;
> + __u32 i;
> +
> + /* 1. Close attach_btf_obj_fd (upper 32 bits of st_ops->type_id_off) */
> + emit2(gen, BPF_LD_IMM64_RAW_FULL(BPF_REG_0, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE,
> + 0, 0, 0, st_ops->type_id_off));
> + emit(gen, BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0));
> + emit(gen, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 32));
> + __emit_sys_close(gen);
[Severity: Low]
Does this leak attach_btf_obj_fd if an earlier runtime check fails and jumps
to cleanup_label?
When the target struct_ops type is in a kernel module,
bpf_gen__init_kern_struct_ops() stores the module btf file descriptor in the
upper 32 bits of st_ops->type_id_off before map creation and program loading
are emitted. Because gen->cleanup_label only closes stack file descriptors
and fd_array map file descriptors, any emit_check_err() failure before
reaching bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem() leaves attach_btf_obj_fd open.
> +
> + /* 2. Populate prog_fd into kern_vdata for all callback members */
> + type = btf__type_by_id(btf, st_ops->type_id);
> + for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(type); i++) {
> + struct bpf_program *prog = st_ops->progs[i];
> + int prog_idx, off_slot;
> +
> + if (!prog)
> + continue;
> +
> + prog_idx = bpf_program_idx(prog);
> + off_slot = st_ops->kern_func_off[i];
> +
> + /* R2 = dynamic kernel member offset from off_slot */
> + emit2(gen, BPF_LD_IMM64_RAW_FULL(BPF_REG_1, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE,
> + 0, 0, 0, off_slot));
> + emit(gen, BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 0));
> + emit(gen, BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_2,
> + KERN_VDATA_MAX_SIZE - sizeof(__u64), 2));
> + emit(gen, BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_7, -E2BIG));
> + emit_check_err(gen);
> +
> + /* R1 = kern_vdata_off + offset */
> + emit2(gen, BPF_LD_IMM64_RAW_FULL(BPF_REG_1, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE,
> + 0, 0, 0, st_ops->kern_vdata_off));
> + emit(gen, BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2));
> +
> + /* R0 = prog_fd from stack (stack_off(prog_fd[prog_idx])) */
> + emit(gen, BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10,
> + stack_off(prog_fd[prog_idx])));
[Severity: Medium]
Can stack_off(prog_fd[prog_idx]) read the wrong stack slot or go out of
bounds when obj->programs[] contains subprograms or non-autoloaded programs?
bpf_program_idx() returns prog - prog->obj->programs, whereas
bpf_object__load_progs() skips subprograms (such as functions in .text) and
non-autoloaded programs, and bpf_gen__prog_load() stores each loaded
program's file descriptor sequentially at stack_off(prog_fd[gen->nr_progs]):
tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c:bpf_gen__prog_load() {
...
/* remember prog_fd in the stack, if successful */
emit(gen, BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_7,
stack_off(prog_fd[gen->nr_progs])));
gen->nr_progs++;
}
When any skipped program precedes prog in obj->programs[], prog_idx does not
match the program's slot in prog_fd[], so the generated loader either writes
the wrong file descriptor into kern_vdata or emits an out-of-bounds stack
read that the verifier rejects if prog_idx exceeds the prog_fd[] array size.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106-lskel-struct-ops-v1-0-a4486ffc79cb@google.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 20:19 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Support struct_ops in light skeletons Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Add bpf_btf_get_struct_member_info() helper Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/7] libbpf: Implement bpf_gen__init_kern_struct_ops() for light skeletons Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/7] libbpf: Support BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS in bpf_gen__map_create() Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Support BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS in bpf_gen__prog_load() Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: Implement bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem() for light skeletons Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 6/7] bpftool: Generate attach and detach for struct_ops in " Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add light skeleton struct_ops tests Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-09 19:46 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Support struct_ops in light skeletons Ihor Solodrai
2026-11-09 21:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-11-10 13:08 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-11-10 13:12 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-11-11 7:35 ` Sid Nayyar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-202249@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sidnayyar@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox