From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kang Chen" <k.chen@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: make DSQ iterator stay drained after NULL
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 13:01:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207066@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110125113.2935742-1-k.chen@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [High] sched_ext: recursive dsq->lock deadlock via
bpf_iter_scx_dsq_next() in tracing [1]
--
commit 892356944fb79fb9f40ab2f24779b6976bd4ec25
Author: Kang Chen <k.chen@smail.nju.edu.cn>
sched_ext: make DSQ iterator stay drained after NULL
This commit records a drained flag in the DSQ iterator cursor once
nldsq_cursor_next_task() returns NULL so subsequent calls to
bpf_iter_scx_dsq_next() continue returning NULL.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index ebdf7b91f9d37..f2bfd43d75526 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -11028,13 +11030,24 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new(struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq *it, u64 dsq_id,
> __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_iter_scx_dsq_next(struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq *it)
> {
> struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern *kit = (void *)it;
> + struct task_struct *p;
>
> - if (!kit->dsq)
> + if (!kit->dsq || (kit->cursor.flags & __SCX_DSQ_ITER_DRAINED))
> return NULL;
>
> guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&kit->dsq->lock);
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can bpf_iter_scx_dsq_next()
and bpf_iter_scx_dsq_destroy() deadlock [1] on kit->dsq->lock when
called from a BPF tracing program?
The DSQ iterator kfuncs are registered in scx_kfunc_ids_any and are not
listed in scx_kfunc_ids_no_tracing, so scx_kfunc_context_filter() allows
BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs to call them. If a tracing program runs
while the current CPU already holds the same user DSQ's lock, iterating that
DSQ attempts to acquire kit->dsq->lock recursively on the same CPU:
scx_dispatch_enqueue()
raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock)
...
scx_error()
trace_sched_ext_exit()
<BPF tracing prog>
bpf_iter_scx_dsq_next()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kit->dsq->lock) <-- spins forever
Adding the DSQ iterator kfuncs to scx_kfunc_ids_no_tracing would prevent
tracing programs from calling them.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-243627bf-8f5e-401e-a2af-0b6c5d9b3088
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110125113.2935742-1-k.chen@smail.nju.edu.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 12:51 [PATCH] sched_ext: make DSQ iterator stay drained after NULL Kang Chen
2026-11-10 13:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207066@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=k.chen@smail.nju.edu.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox