From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Slawomir Stepien" <sst@poczta.fm>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/4] xdp: split generic XDP skb handling
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 10:20:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208777@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110101941.1059662-4-sst@poczta.fm>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] xdp: netif_skb_check_for_xdp() drops shared skbs in
pskb_expand_head()
- [Medium] xdp: netif_receive_generic_xdp() mutates shared skb before
CoW
--
commit 154810a21d3faf42403d1f38f7f61c4add271315
Author: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
xdp: split generic XDP skb handling
This commit introduces __do_xdp_generic() and struct xdp_generic_ctx so
callers can supply their own xdp_buff, page_pool, and xdp_rxq_info, and
adds skb_shared(skb) to the generic XDP copy-on-write check via
skb_needs_xdp_cow().
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 12595f6b9eba7..81848e638173b 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5774,15 +5779,31 @@ u32 bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> return act;
> }
>
> +u32 bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> + const struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
> +{
> + return __bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp(skb, xdp, xdp_prog, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static int
> -netif_skb_check_for_xdp(struct sk_buff **pskb, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +netif_skb_check_for_xdp(struct sk_buff **pskb, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct page_pool *page_pool)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
> int err, hroom, troom;
>
> - local_lock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> - err = skb_cow_data_for_xdp(this_cpu_read(system_page_pool.pool), pskb, prog);
> - local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> + if (page_pool) {
> + /* veth, the caller with its own page_pool, limits the MTU so
> + * that the copy is linear even for programs without frags
> + * support, and always copied into its page_pool.
> + */
> + err = skb_pp_cow_data(page_pool, pskb, XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM);
> + } else {
> + local_lock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> + err = skb_cow_data_for_xdp(this_cpu_read(system_page_pool.pool),
> + pskb, prog);
> + local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> + }
> if (!err)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -5800,9 +5821,22 @@ netif_skb_check_for_xdp(struct sk_buff **pskb, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> return skb_linearize(skb);
> }
>
> +/* Run the program on a private, page_pool-backed copy when it could otherwise
> + * change data someone else sees (shared or cloned skb), when frags have to be
> + * page_pool-backed so that XDP helpers can release them, or when the XDP
> + * headroom contract is not met. The head does not have to be a page frag:
> + * skb-backed XDP never turns the head into an xdp_frame.
> + */
> +static bool skb_needs_xdp_cow(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + return skb_shared(skb) || skb_cloned(skb) || skb_is_nonlinear(skb) ||
> + skb_headroom(skb) < XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Does adding skb_shared(skb) here cause do_xdp_generic() to warn and drop
shared skbs when running a non-frags XDP program?
When page_pool is NULL (as in do_xdp_generic()) and
!prog->aux->xdp_has_frags, skb_cow_data_for_xdp() returns -EINVAL without
copying the skb. netif_skb_check_for_xdp() then falls back to
pskb_expand_head(skb, ...), which rejects shared skbs with
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(1) and -EINVAL:
net/core/skbuff.c:pskb_expand_head() {
...
if (unlikely(skb_shared(skb))) {
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
...
}
Any shared skb (for example from pktgen with F_SHARED or after a packet
tap takes a reference before an rx_handler returns RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER) is
then dropped at do_drop instead of being unshared.
> static u32 netif_receive_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff **pskb,
> struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> - const struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
> + const struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> + struct xdp_generic_ctx *ctx)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
> u32 mac_len, act = XDP_DROP;
> @@ -5820,15 +5854,17 @@ static u32 netif_receive_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff **pskb,
> mac_len = skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb);
> __skb_push(skb, mac_len);
>
> - if (skb_cloned(skb) || skb_is_nonlinear(skb) ||
> - skb_headroom(skb) < XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM) {
> - if (netif_skb_check_for_xdp(pskb, xdp_prog))
> + if (skb_needs_xdp_cow(skb)) {
> + if (netif_skb_check_for_xdp(pskb, xdp_prog, ctx->page_pool))
> goto do_drop;
> }
>
> __skb_pull(*pskb, mac_len);
[Severity: Medium]
Doesn't __skb_push(skb, mac_len) before skb_needs_xdp_cow() corrupt
skb->data and skb->len for other holders of a shared skb?
Unlike a cloned skb, a shared skb shares the struct sk_buff itself. When
skb_pp_cow_data() replaces *pskb with a newly allocated nskb and calls
consume_skb(skb), the subsequent __skb_pull(*pskb, mac_len) only pulls
mac_len on nskb (and is skipped altogether on the goto do_drop path),
leaving the original shared skb with skb->data pushed back by mac_len and
skb->len increased by mac_len for any remaining reference holders.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110101941.1059662-1-sst@poczta.fm?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 10:19 [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/4] xdp: reuse generic skb XDP handling for veth Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-10 10:19 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/4] xdp: add mixed page_pool/page_shared memory type Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-10 10:19 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/4] xdp: return status from generic_xdp_tx() Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-11 10:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 10:19 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/4] xdp: split generic XDP skb handling Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-11 10:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 10:19 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/4] veth: use generic skb XDP handling Slawomir Stepien
2026-11-11 10:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 12:48 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/4] xdp: reuse generic skb XDP handling for veth Maciej Fijalkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208777@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sst@poczta.fm \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox