From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 05/11] xsk: Install UMEM page pool providers in the core
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 10:22:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208788@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110102039.1002605-6-bjorn@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] xsk: UAF of pool and UMEM on xsk_pp_bind() failure with active
page_pool
- [High] xsk: unconditional DMA unmap and UMEM release in
xsk_pp_unbind()
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [Critical] net: null pointer dereference in __netdev_queue_config()
[1]
--
commit 34e15c1f4828114e9aaedcfa55376bd7c379c9a3
Author: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
xsk: Install UMEM page pool providers in the core
This commit installs AF_XDP UMEM memory providers through the netdev RX
queue API for drivers setting netdev_queue_mgmt_ops.xsk_page_pool, and
defers allocating pool->heads to copy mode and driver zero-copy.
> diff --git a/net/core/netdev_config.c b/net/core/netdev_config.c
> index 1975de42a60d9..97e33764737bd 100644
> --- a/net/core/netdev_config.c
> +++ b/net/core/netdev_config.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ static int __netdev_queue_config(struct net_device *dev, int rxq_idx,
> mpp = &__netif_get_rx_queue(dev, rxq_idx)->mp_params;
> if (mpp->rx_page_size)
> qcfg->rx_page_size = mpp->rx_page_size;
> + if (mpp->rx_headroom)
> + qcfg->rx_headroom = mpp->rx_headroom;
> err = validate_cb(dev, qcfg, extack);
> if (err)
> return err;
[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can __netdev_queue_config()
dereference a NULL dev->queue_mgmt_ops pointer [1] when called on a
device without queue management ops?
Earlier in __netdev_queue_config(), dev->queue_mgmt_ops is dereferenced
without a NULL check:
net/core/netdev_config.c:__netdev_queue_config() {
...
validate_cb = netdev_nop_validate_qcfg;
if (validate && dev->queue_mgmt_ops->ndo_validate_qcfg)
validate_cb = dev->queue_mgmt_ops->ndo_validate_qcfg;
memset(qcfg, 0, sizeof(*qcfg));
/* Get defaults from the driver, in case user config not set */
if (dev->queue_mgmt_ops->ndo_default_qcfg)
dev->queue_mgmt_ops->ndo_default_qcfg(dev, qcfg);
...
}
Calling netdev_queue_config() or netdev_queue_config_validate() on a device
where dev->queue_mgmt_ops is NULL will panic.
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_pp.c b/net/xdp/xsk_pp.c
> index fdd55265a6cdc..c2214e718cdb3 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_pp.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_pp.c
[ ... ]
> + mp.mp_priv = pp;
> + mp.rx_page_size = pool->chunk_size;
> + mp.rx_headroom = xsk_pool_get_headroom(pool);
> + err = netif_mp_open_rxq(dev, queue_id, &mp, NULL);
> + if (!err) {
> + pp->rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(dev, queue_id);
> + pool->pp = pp;
> + pool->xdp_zc_max_segs = dev->xdp_zc_max_segs;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + xp_dma_unmap(pool, XSK_PP_DMA_ATTR);
> + /* Copy mode takes the chunks that the provider holds */
> + if (!xp_alloc_heads(pool) && xsk_pp_abandon(pp))
> + xsk_pp_put(pp);
> + else
> + pool->pp = pp;
> +
> + return err;
> +}
[Severity: High]
If netif_mp_open_rxq() fails after ndo_queue_mem_alloc() has created a
page_pool that attached to pp, can this error path cause a use-after-free of
pool and UMEM?
When page_pool_destroy() defers destruction because chunks are still held
(pp->nr_pools > 0), or when xp_alloc_heads(pool) fails:
1. xp_dma_unmap() runs unconditionally before xsk_pp_abandon(), unmapping
DMA pages while the lingering page_pool still owns chunks.
2. xsk_pp_bind() sets pool->pp = pp without clearing pp->fq, and
xp_assign_dev() skips the copy-mode fallback because pool->pp is set,
returning err to xsk_bind().
3. xsk_bind() calls xp_destroy(xs->pool), which drops only pool's reference
on pp via xsk_pp_put(pool->pp) and immediately kvfree()s pool:
net/xdp/xsk.c:xsk_bind() {
...
err = xp_assign_dev(xs->pool, dev, qid, flags);
if (err) {
xp_destroy(xs->pool);
xs->pool = NULL;
goto out_unlock;
}
...
}
The lingering page_pool still holds its reference to pp, leaving pp->pool
dangling (dereferenced in xsk_pp_alloc_fill() and xsk_pp_refill_done()) and
pp->fq pointing to xs->fq_tmp. Because xs->pool is now NULL and xs->state
remains XSK_READY, closing the socket frees xs->fq_tmp and calls
xdp_put_umem(xs->umem, true), which vunmaps umem->addrs and unpins umem->pgs
while the page_pool still holds chunks.
> +/* Called with RTNL and the instance lock of the device */
> +void xsk_pp_unbind(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
> +{
> + struct xsk_pp *pp = pool->pp;
> + struct pp_memory_provider_params mp = {
> + .mp_ops = &xsk_pp_ops,
> + .mp_priv = pp,
> + };
> +
> + /* Unregister removed the provider already */
> + if (!pp->rxq)
> + return;
> +
> + netif_mp_close_rxq(pool->netdev, pool->queue_id, &mp);
> + xsk_pp_detach(pp);
> +}
[Severity: High]
Can xsk_pp_unbind() and xp_release_deferred() unmap DMA and free the pool
and UMEM while the RX queue or page_pool is still using them?
xsk_pp_unbind() ignores the return value of netif_mp_close_rxq() and
unconditionally calls xsk_pp_detach(pp) -> xp_dma_unmap(). If
netif_mp_close_rxq() fails (for example, -ENOMEM when allocating replacement
queue memory in netdev_rx_queue_reconfig()), the hardware RX queue remains
active on the unmapped UMEM pages.
Furthermore, right after xp_clear_dev() returns in xp_release_deferred(),
xdp_put_umem(pool->umem, false) unpins and vunmaps the UMEM and
xp_destroy(pool) frees pool, even if netif_mp_close_rxq() failed or
page_pool_destroy() deferred releasing in-flight netmems (pp->refs > 0).
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-47dd1618-68d7-4419-9441-df54e8f32d4d
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110102039.1002605-1-bjorn@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 10:20 [PATCH net-next v1 00/11] xsk: Zero copy through page-pool memory providers Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 01/11] net: Get skb fragment addresses through netmem Björn Töpel
2026-11-12 8:32 ` saeed bishara
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 02/11] net: Add memory provider capabilities Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 22:19 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 12:41 ` Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 23:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 10:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 03/11] xdp: Copy buffers with restricted lifetime Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 22:32 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 13:27 ` Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 23:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 10:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 04/11] xsk: Allocate UMEM chunks through page_pool Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 15:08 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-11-11 13:51 ` Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 23:02 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 13:59 ` Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 23:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 05/11] xsk: Install UMEM page pool providers in the core Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 23:50 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 14:01 ` Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 8:59 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-11-11 19:26 ` Björn Töpel
2026-11-12 8:08 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-11-11 10:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 06/11] page_pool: Coordinate refill with memory providers Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 23:51 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 19:37 ` Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 23:13 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-11 10:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 07/11] xsk: Deliver provider chunks without copying Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-11 23:20 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 08/11] eth: fbnic: Support XDP redirect Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 10:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 09/11] eth: fbnic: Use netmem for RX headers and XDP_TX Björn Töpel
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 10/11] eth: fbnic: Support RX buffers it cannot split Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 10:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 21:45 ` Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next v1 11/11] eth: fbnic: Support AF_XDP page pool zero copy Björn Töpel
2026-11-11 10:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 22:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208788@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox