From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BAF237160 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743522854; cv=none; b=uLz273KbZbMNmdEj5njCYVx7fNnXb2ekcXNoX9CC3qrUGI1dq7BQ3xJnmcLkchzAQzF2Rm2PFvCFOZz1JS03J2mnTSc5QQz3ABtNwAjAUX7BMnJtRL8VETk5FzQ7oq2KIa+6JhBfXIW3143P0UdvClGcewuRgw/Pc0RfRbaHMF4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743522854; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZFA0yVI3UYiZQnRBU+RGdoE40VIqwmij7YchgMiohIg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=e7lCJh1wP6opdqRwPv88KPkC4ieiEXRlZtwbVuPFvypZFR8A0uqAgySD1oK/zWIPfQ3+YGP+tgXvCCG4GRvbwNEPKknb1zdgk5CSB6Q306gJI+Za3RXnV7/fEKkUv7Tc8ssu8U9Imk98xGNNMzBjxwUiJOlZW8d1fyvL2o1OCew= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=YAOZl+tc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="YAOZl+tc" Received: from pps.filterd (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 531E3IUE011758; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:53:51 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=VVZrHrHVFTiwIjChPXp3QNULr+GZaI aw64nWjsSBAPI=; b=YAOZl+tcDjENOLwBmPFMR4IVb6wArvkLXfon5c5fLUYtsc SysuFxmhDyL5X2V2xuPbgM0t1t8zPCG7IoUsQmblodsFT9mWmZbBs2XSlnBuWEYo LTTnRkoYHOzlKA8cvJYCtZhS2AeNSzxSTkUufcDGmJZq/Up52RtzF47RCtI2PKrb iNCjkEGC/XmprpjWVCnDYGJbJOuJruh2FmoR+WdCXa/mcFIMEsAramDR932ktvan abOHk84t5XasrekGAQdRe4ev6aa9cqFL7Y+cAIckqFx358vyaFar/yBykUHJ8amL EfwEMisNeiea6g2KrWA5jY1jgX+MwJcHBjbgQXlg== Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 45rhjprjup-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 15:53:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 531DV4Wt001719; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:53:50 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 45rddkscdv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 15:53:50 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 531FriR656885554 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:53:44 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB6E20049; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:53:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E075320040; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:53:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.171.61.169]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:53:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 17:53:42 +0200 From: Vasily Gorbik To: iii Cc: Ihor Solodrai , Ilya Leoshkevich , Yonghong Song , Song Liu , Alexei Starovoitov , bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, Sumanth Korikkar , Heiko Carstens , Alexander Gordeev Subject: Re: s390x: selftests/bpf are failing on CI Message-ID: References: <7adb418e282468fcd5dc10c05790614e622579d4@linux.dev> <7d55acbf6e6b20f9e8d679883c1e77391e80b304@linux.dev> <1199a2932ed1800fa0a898e67ba74590@imap.linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 56G8wkuO8RwIH1JJgmKCrwT_ppDatgJX X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 56G8wkuO8RwIH1JJgmKCrwT_ppDatgJX X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1095,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-04-01_06,2025-04-01_01,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=847 phishscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2502280000 definitions=main-2504010096 On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 05:16:28PM +0200, iii wrote: > On 2025-04-01 10:06, iii wrote: > > On 2025-04-01 00:45, Ihor Solodrai wrote: > > > On 3/31/25 3:25 PM, iii wrote: > > > > On 2025-03-31 20:25, Ihor Solodrai wrote: > > > > > Hi Ilya, > > > > > > > > > > After recent merges from upstream, CI started failing both > > > > > on bpf and > > > > > bpf-next trees. Yonghong Song and Song Liu submitted a > > > > > couple of fixes > > > > > that are already applied to bpf tree, but there are still > > > > > failures on > > > > > s390x. > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/14163772245 > > > > > > > > > > Could you please investigate? > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > I could not reproduce this on a s390x machine, so I downloaded the CI > artifacts and noticed that > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions is empty. > Turns out this is caused by cross-compilation. > I have let our kernel team (on Cc:) know and they will investigate this > further. There must be an endianness issue in the sorttable tool. Reverting just the commit fa1518875286 ("s390: Sort mcount locations at build time") fixes the issue. I'll take a look.