From: "The Q" <theq@rogers.com>
To: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Bridge] Sniffing a linux bridge vs sniffing enslaved interfaces
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:35:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02f601d04a30$8eb33820$ac19a860$@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To:
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 249 bytes --]
Hi all
Assume that you have a linux bridge with two interfaces eth0 and eth1
enslaved to this bridge
What is the difference between sniffing the bridge and sniffing its
interfaces?
tcpdump -i br0 vs tcpdump -i eth0
Thanks
MiniME
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2229 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 21:35 The Q [this message]
2015-02-16 22:17 ` [Bridge] Sniffing a linux bridge vs sniffing enslaved interfaces Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2015-02-16 22:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-02-16 22:39 ` Q
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='02f601d04a30$8eb33820$ac19a860$@rogers.com' \
--to=theq@rogers.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox