From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E4CD483187
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org CB6C182F31
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:59:13 +0200
From: netdev@kapio-technology.com
In-Reply-To: <Yzb3oNGNtq4GCS3M@shredder>
References: <20220928150256.115248-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com>
 <20220929091036.3812327f@kernel.org>
 <12587604af1ed79be4d3a1607987483a@kapio-technology.com>
 <20220929112744.27cc969b@kernel.org>
 <ab488e3d1b9d456ae96cfd84b724d939@kapio-technology.com>
 <Yzb3oNGNtq4GCS3M@shredder>
Message-ID: <16d6db15df0a875e442456ff56234b98@kapio-technology.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v6 net-next 0/9] Extend locked port feature
 with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB)
List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging <bridge.lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bridge>, 
 <mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>,
 <mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@gmail.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@wifirst.fr>, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>, Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>, Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@gmail.com>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@gmail.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>, davem@davemloft.net

On 2022-09-30 16:05, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:42:37AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com 
> wrote:
>> Obviously my method of selecting all switchcore drivers with 
>> sub-options
>> under menuconfig was not sufficient, and I didn't know of the 
>> allmodconfig
>> option, otherwise I would have used it.
> 
> You can see build issues on patchwork:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220928150256.115248-6-netdev@kapio-technology.com/
> 
> Also:
> 
> https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#what-level-of-testing-is-expected-before-i-submit-my-change
> 
> https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#can-i-reproduce-the-checks-from-patchwork-on-my-local-machine
> 
> https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#running-all-the-builds-and-checks-locally-is-a-pain-can-i-post-my-patches-and-have-the-patchwork-bot-validate-them
> 
>> So the question is if I should repost the fixed patch-set or I need to 
>> make
>> a new version?
> 
> A new fixed version (v7) is required, but wait for this version to be
> reviewed first.
> 
>> Anyhow I hope that there will not be problems when running the 
>> selftests, as
>> I have not been able to do so with my system, so there can be more 
>> that
>> needs to be changed.
> 
> It's not really acceptable to post tests that you haven't run... What
> exactly is the issue? You should be able to run the tests with veth
> pairs in a VM.

It is only the blackhole test that I have not been able to run as is, 
but I have stepped it manually as far as I could.
My environment has changed lately and in that context the building of 
the selftests fails and I don't know why,I just get some error 
messagesabout missing header files, and setting up a whole system like 
f.ex. linuxfromscratch with the necessary libs and tools to run it in a 
VM is too time consuming a task at the moment.

If there is some freely available system for the purpose out there 
besides my own system based on Buildroot that does not work now, please 
let me know...