From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCCB31A2390; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744252196; cv=none; b=udtEs+jXs8dc1QuXU565Lq+lxKYbBonGf92ZhVllrPnoZeACShgRWzy1fM34Ul6Ce3lWzH3jv0N4A1K5OYEhqDIwiNjHg+pKsUmdCcT0a36X7QzECA7KosxQMBR9lFNu+wOSdENq8hOrUpx5bBnQz1QDrLKik3yobQxdkV0vNDU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744252196; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E7Des7EK+sUgtkY+WWs2fRdo6Bd/TmZZDDYF1r+l6Bk=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=uu16V3PkGuDADFjwojPxplbTMqHzdwFnPP23ccjNPmpFQWQb9VVJ+ydhdepi/rdXg84DRLFK4hHVmbrVxy+sgjwuzCIs8En/368xhA+GLmCN9Fr5CfQCRU9NAZD0QzlN+6WRtuaLCnySEozVB/pp6lODnrAVXJilb/V2dr/LM/I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PkMau/40; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PkMau/40" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45822C4CEE2; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:29:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744252196; bh=E7Des7EK+sUgtkY+WWs2fRdo6Bd/TmZZDDYF1r+l6Bk=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=PkMau/40iG7yghU/12Wz+qD1NdYequg4GpOWJX2XoM9VW32GB2fhJZVeasFTZFPuU XUwAyZ5WnChtpQY6XUjb8gTlyKEKoD4xCG4dQg0VUy1WUL8Z6fiDQGLIoB1qAO5c7Q VcYm163376I29iejxAYjVuU+yKrEtm08M8YLl7hEFuOT6Ipg2FshA7Hmw2+G/yJUF/ ZCMHY/4jhTlH2FsJ2C4ueEsPwvUZh5xuFABJdPvA/Eaq+uwvABhJPv2C0gA21P21J3 MrY4Vk7FWcF+YPIsKpeWNJ1LJVsd9XMqiyGB6AiOemvUHKWFr+thFgXpHI4TXF4Jeb 0uKJNSN2UiWjQ== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB23438111DC; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bridge@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] bridge: Prevent unicast ARP/NS packets from being suppressed by bridge From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <174425223377.3120264.13308441300773749640.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:30:33 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: To: Petr Machata Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, razor@blackwall.org, idosch@nvidia.com, bridge@lists.linux.dev, mlxsw@nvidia.com Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:40:22 +0200 you wrote: > From: Amit Cohen > > Currently, unicast ARP requests/NS packets are replied by bridge when > suppression is enabled, then they are also forwarded, which results two > replicas of ARP reply/NA - one from the bridge and second from the target. > > The purpose of ARP/ND suppression is to reduce flooding in the broadcast > domain, which is not relevant for unicast packets. In addition, the use > case of unicast ARP/NS is to poll a specific host, so it does not make > sense to have the switch answer on behalf of the host. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,1/2] net: bridge: Prevent unicast ARP/NS packets from being suppressed by bridge https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/827b2ac8e796 - [net-next,2/2] selftests: test_bridge_neigh_suppress: Test unicast ARP/NS with suppression https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0ffb594212a0 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html