From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Hannes Schulz <schulz@schwaar.com>
Cc: bridge@osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] Re: [2.4.22] bad interaction between e100 and bridge: BUG at dev.c:991!
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:38:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030903083859.18365849.shemminger@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p05111b01bb7a6c4659d6@[10.96.96.13]>
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 16:56:06 +0200
Hannes Schulz <schulz@schwaar.com> wrote:
> >Could the problem be that the e100 can do IP receive checksumming on
> >the board,
> >but the eepro driver doesn't enable it. When the board is doing checksum
> >offload, then the csum field isn't set.
> >
> >Please try disabling receive checksumming on the e100 driver
> >
> > modprobe e100 XsumRX=0
> >
> >If this is the problem, it exists both 2.4 and 2.6.
>
> If have just booted into 2.6.0-test4. Unplugging works, but the
> console is flooded with:
> last-F IN=br0 OUT=br0 PHYSIN=eth1 PHYSOUT=eth0 SRC=10.96.96.25 DST=10.96.96.255
>
> [last-F ist the last rule in my FORWARDING iptable and does log+drop]
>
> Obviously I must allow forwarding br0 <=> br0.
>
> While I am writing this the counter on the FORWARDING rule -i br0 -o
> br0 -j ACCEPT has reaches 2000+ packets with eth0 unplugged and the
> kernel ist still running.
>
>
> In both 2.4.22 and 2.6.0-test4 all of netfilter and advanced routing
> ist set to M. In 2.6.0-test4 this includes ebtables.
>
>
> Hope that helps
>
> Hannes
You enabled NETFILTER_DEBUG in your config
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-03 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <p05111b01bb728bc8972e@[10.96.96.13]>
2003-08-27 20:28 ` [Bridge] Re: [2.4.22] bad interaction between e100 and bridge: BUG at dev.c:991! Stephen Hemminger
2003-08-28 20:24 ` [Bridge] [more info] " Hannes Schulz
2003-08-31 2:01 ` [Bridge] " David S. Miller
2003-09-02 17:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-09-02 18:23 ` Bart De Schuymer
2003-09-02 18:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-05 18:30 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2.4] bridging and hw checksum fix Stephen Hemminger
2003-09-03 14:56 ` [Bridge] Re: [2.4.22] bad interaction between e100 and bridge: BUG at dev.c:991! Hannes Schulz
2003-09-03 15:38 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2003-09-03 16:49 ` Bart De Schuymer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030903083859.18365849.shemminger@osdl.org \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=bridge@osdl.org \
--cc=schulz@schwaar.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox