From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:25:08 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Message-ID: <20050315172508.GQ3189@stusta.de>
References: <20050315121930.GE3189@stusta.de>
	<20050315091305.3fc07561@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050315091305.3fc07561@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
Subject: [Bridge] Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error
List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging  <bridge.lists.osdl.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>,
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>,
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, bridge@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.co

On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:13:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> Given the #ifdef mess, perhaps bridge should have the hooks available
> independent of the configuration.

The problem is the other way round:
The bridge code accesses hooks in the ATM code.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed