From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Alex Zeffertt <ajz@cambridgebroadband.com>
Cc: bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] bridge_list orphans in linux-2.4
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:56:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060921155629.6d3eb7b3@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451296BE.1060002@cambridgebroadband.com>
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:42:22 +0100
Alex Zeffertt <ajz@cambridgebroadband.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We use linux-2.4.20 in one of our products and we've found what looks
> to be a problem in the bridge module. (I know this is old code but we
> don't send our customers kernel upgrades unless we really have to!)
>
> The problem is that some of our bridges have become orphaned from the
> bridge module. Specifically
>
> ifconfig ourbridgename
>
> shows that the device "ourbridgename" is known to the kernel, but
>
> brctl show
>
> does not list "ourbridgename".
You need to find a sequence of commands that reproduces it.
Unless you run multiple commands in parallel, I don't think
there should be a problem with 2.4.
> I've looked through the bridge module and it seems that the most likely
> explanation is that bridge_list in br_if.c has become corrupted, causing
> the bridge called "ourbridgename" to become orphaned.
>
> I cannot see how this would happen, however, since bridge_list is only
> ever referenced under the ioctl_mutex. I should also point out that
> br_del_bridge() is not called by our application.
>
> I noticed that in later kernels the ioctl_mutex has been replaced by
> the rtnl_lock(). Why was this done? Could this be related to our
> problem?
In 2.6 it was observed that all changes to bridge list were already
being done under the RT netlink mutex, so no additional locking
was needed.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-21 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-21 13:42 [Bridge] bridge_list orphans in linux-2.4 Alex Zeffertt
2006-09-21 22:56 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
[not found] <AA48EE0D609E8547912F0039B5E47BC261BE14@SHI-EXCHBE1.shipara.hcltech.com>
2006-12-15 15:01 ` Alex Zeffertt
2006-12-15 18:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-15 18:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-12-18 10:01 ` Alex Zeffertt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060921155629.6d3eb7b3@localhost.localdomain \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=ajz@cambridgebroadband.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox