Re: [Bridge] tagged vlan + bridge: good with xen bad otherwise

[Daniele Palumbo <daniele@retaggio.net>]

sorry for double posting, was from non registered address.

On Tuesday 30 January 2007 14:08, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
> first of all, this is not xen-related, but i found the problem managing
> with xen.
> so, knowledge of xen is only suggested.

find out why:
xen do (not by its choise, it's a "bug"):
eth1 - xenbr1 - veth1 - ifconfig veth1 up
                      \ vconfig add veth1 600 - veth1.600 - xenbr1.600
                      \ vconfig add veth1 14 - veth1.14 - xenbr1.14

> i want two type of bridge:
> xenbr1 (with eth1 and other interfaces added later)
> xenbr1.14 (with eth1.14 and other interfaces added later)
>
> xenbr1 must have all the traffic tagged.
> xenbr1.14 must have untagged traffic for vlan 14.

so now:
how can i manage something like:

eth1 - xenbr1
     \ vconfig add eth1 600 - eth1.600 - xenbr1.600
     \ vconfig add eth1 14 - eth1.14 - xenbr1.14
?

in first (working) scenario, the problem is that ALL traffic goes through 
xenbr1... with one more step against second scenario.

thanks
d.