From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uli Luckas Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:27:43 +0100 References: <282915.85653.qm@web8807.mail.in.yahoo.com> <49213FC5.4040001@sysnetsistemi.it> In-Reply-To: <49213FC5.4040001@sysnetsistemi.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811301727.44483.luckas@musoft.de> Subject: Re: [Bridge] =?iso-8859-1?q?Bridge_ports_needlessly_going_through_lea?= =?iso-8859-1?q?rning_stage_when=09STP_is_disabled?= List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger , rahul bhardwaj Am Monday, 17. November 2008 schrieb Francesco Dolcini: > rahul bhardwaj wrote: > > Is this the right behavior ? The 15 to 30 second delay before the > > port moves to Forwarding state can be frustrating, as you don't > > expect it, and for that period of time, start to think there is > > something else wrong in the network's configuration. Is there any > > place in the code where I do some change to resolve this issue. > > At the moment the normal way to handle this is "brctl setfd $BR_DEV 0" > Except that setting fd to zero might get you flooded. See thread "delay in= =20 bridge learning when forward delay is 0" here on the list. [1]=20 regards, Uli [1] http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20081013.181016.4cbfa529.de.html =2D-=20 > Ich habe Zone Alarm in Hintergrund mitlaufen, das ist fuer mich > Pflicht. Ich habe eine Sch=FCssel Weihwasser neben der Tastatur stehen. Das hilft genauso. (J=FCrgen Schmadlak)