From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:42:29 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20090810134229.GA10036@redhat.com> References: <1249595428-21594-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <200908092042.24686.arnd@arndb.de> <20090810085003.GA3654@redhat.com> <200908101529.46285.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200908101529.46285.arnd@arndb.de> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] macvlan: add tap device backend List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Herbert Xu , "Fischer, Anna" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Or Gerlitz , Edge Virtual Bridging On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:29:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 10 August 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Would it be enough to check the dev_queue_xmit() return > > > code for NETDEV_TX_BUSY? > > > > > > How would I get notified when it gets free again? > > > > You can do this by creating a socket. Look at how tun does > > this now. > > Hmm, I was hoping to be able to avoid this, because I can > interact more directly with the outbound physical interface > using dev_queue_xmit() instead of netif_rx_ni(). Yea, that's what tun does. socket just notifies you when packets are freed. > I'll have a look. Thanks, > > Arnd <><