From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:23:10 +0200 References: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E67D2DCECBB@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> <200908071329.44437.arnd@arndb.de> <005101ca1797$70dcf5b0$5296e110$@edu> In-Reply-To: <005101ca1797$70dcf5b0$5296e110$@edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908101723.10832.arnd@arndb.de> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [evb] Re: [PATCH][RFC] net/bridge: add basic VEPA support List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: evb@yahoogroups.com Cc: "'Fischer, Anna'" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, 'Or Gerlitz' , adobriyan@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net On Friday 07 August 2009, Paul Congdon (UC Davis) wrote: > > I don't think your scheme works too well because broadcast packet coming > from other interfaces on br0 would get replicated and sent across the wire > to ethB multiple times. Right, that won't work. So the bridge patch for the hairpin turn is still the best solution. Btw, how will that interact with the bride-netfilter (ebtables) setup? Can you apply any filters that work on current bridges also between two VEPA ports while doing the hairpin turn? Arnd <><