From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ross Vandegrift Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:04:48 -0500 Message-ID: <20100112220448.GF23219@kallisti.us> References: <20100112213223.GD23219@kallisti.us> <001485f790a4c2633c047cfe80e0@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ExXT7PjY8AI4Hyfa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001485f790a4c2633c047cfe80e0@google.com> Subject: Re: [Bridge] =?iso-8859-1?q?Re=A0=3ARe=3A_Re=A0=3ARe=3A__Bridging_LAC?= =?iso-8859-1?q?P_=28802=2E3ad=29_frames_not=09working?= List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: jhautbois@gmail.com Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org --ExXT7PjY8AI4Hyfa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:40:30PM +0000, jhautbois@gmail.com wrote: > This is exactly the problem. > But, sounds like it is not possible... ? You could run a custom version of the bridge driver to enable bridging of frames sent to the bridge-management MAC addresses. Some folks have talked about doing similar things to enable bridging of STP. Doing that with STP makes a bit more sense to me (since there are valid networks that could be constructed that way). But you'll be breaking a pretty fundamental assumption of LACP.... --=20 Ross Vandegrift ross@kallisti.us "If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough, the songs get tougher." --Woody Guthrie --ExXT7PjY8AI4Hyfa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktM8gAACgkQMlMoONfO+HC6UwCgkLsC/ZE4ovcxX1e+A/NV3ELz Rp4AoIFyCMtgrMYkxK2k81b9M3n6/v0U =A5kn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ExXT7PjY8AI4Hyfa--