From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 00:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100506.004457.71584133.davem@davemloft.net> From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1273111530.21962.2753.camel@calx> References: <20100505081514.5157.83783.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <1273111530.21962.2753.camel@calx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bridge] [v5 Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: mpm@selenic.com Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, amwang@redhat.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmoyer@redhat.com, gospo@redhat.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net From: Matt Mackall Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 21:05:30 -0500 > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 04:11 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote: >> V5: >> Fix coding style problems pointed by David. > > Aside from my concern about the policy of disabling netpoll on > bridges/bonds with only partial netpoll support, I don't have any > remaining issues with this. But I'll leave it to other folks to ack the > underlying driver bits for this series. Yes the partial support handling is a thorny issue. But this patch set makes things better than they were before, because support over such devices didn't work at all previously. So I'll toss these patches into net-next-2.6, thanks everyone!