From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100527.133559.193700421.davem@davemloft.net> From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20100527180545.GA2345@sysclose.org> References: <20100505081514.5157.83783.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100527180545.GA2345@sysclose.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bridge] [v5 Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: fbl@sysclose.org Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, amwang@redhat.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mpm@selenic.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmoyer@redhat.com, gospo@redhat.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net From: Flavio Leitner Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:05:45 -0300 > I did the following patch to discard the packet if it was IN_NETPOLL > and the read_lock() fails, so I could go ahead testing it: This is disgusting, let's just disallow console output from such locations. Defer them to a workqueue if their output is so critical.