Ethernet Bridge development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] Allow bridge to function in non-promisc mode
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:43:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130307214304.25e7784e@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362691728-13289-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com>

On Thu,  7 Mar 2013 16:28:45 -0500
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com> wrote:

> The series adds an ability to configure the bridge into a non-primiscuous
> mode.   Instead, it provides the ability to identitfy some set of bridge
> ports as uplinks and allows for MAC addresses to be programmed onto
> those ports.  In case the port hardware does not support mac filter,
> that port will be placed in promiscuous mode.
> 
> Default bridge operation continues to remain as "promiscuous".  The new
> functionality has to be enabled via sysfs (similar to other bridge extensions).
> 
> The uplink mode is implemented as a flag on a bridge port.  The api to
> change that flag follows the existing api to enable/disable other existing
> flags.
> 
> All comments are welcome.
> 

Can we make this a one step process and less visible to the user.
If user defines an uplink device, and the uplink device is capable of filtering
(and what ever other pre-conditions people can think of), then the bridge will
transparently switch to uplink/non-promisc mode.  This can also be used to trigger
edge only mode in RSTP in the future.

Less knobs.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-08  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-07 21:28 [Bridge] [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] Allow bridge to function in non-promisc mode Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-07 21:28 ` [Bridge] [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] bridge: Add sysfs interface to control promisc mode Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-07 21:28 ` [Bridge] [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] bridge: Allow an ability to designate an uplink port Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-07 21:28 ` [Bridge] [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] bridge: Implement IFF_UNICAST_FLT Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-08  5:43 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2013-03-08 15:17   ` [Bridge] [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] Allow bridge to function in non-promisc mode Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-08 21:23     ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-08 21:43       ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-03-14 19:18   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130307214304.25e7784e@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox