From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Cc: john.r.fastabend@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
shemminger@vyatta.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
jhs@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 2/7] bridge: Keep track of ports capable of flooding.
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:41:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140226154122.GC15330@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393427905-6811-3-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:18:20AM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Keep track of bridge ports that have unicast flooding turned on.
> This will later be used by the algorithm to automatically manage
> address programming and promisc mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 3 +++
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 4 ++++
> net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 6 ++++-
> 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> index 54d207d..f072b34 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
>
> #include "br_private.h"
>
> +static void br_add_flood_port(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct net_bridge *br);
> +static void br_del_flood_port(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct net_bridge *br);
> +
same nitpick about forward declarations of static
functions.
maybe they are ok for bridge, but that's my $.02
> /*
> * Determine initial path cost based on speed.
> * using recommendations from 802.1d standard
> @@ -141,11 +144,14 @@ static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>
> br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_DELLINK, p);
>
> + list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> +
> + if (p->flags & BR_FLOOD)
> + br_del_flood_port(p, br);
> +
> nbp_vlan_flush(p);
> br_fdb_delete_by_port(br, p, 1);
>
> - list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> -
> dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_BRIDGE_PORT;
>
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(dev);
ok so it doesn't matter in which order we do
list_del_rcu and nbp_vlan_flush then?
> @@ -383,6 +389,9 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev)
> dev_disable_lro(dev);
>
> list_add_rcu(&p->list, &br->port_list);
> +
> + if (p->flags & BR_FLOOD)
> + br_add_flood_port(p, br);
>
> netdev_update_features(br->dev);
>
> @@ -455,3 +464,50 @@ int br_del_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static void br_add_flood_port(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct net_bridge *br)
> +{
> + /* Increment the number of flooding ports, and if we
> + * only have 1 flooding port cache if for future use.
> + */
> + br->n_flood_ports++;
> + if (br->n_flood_ports == 1)
> + br->c_flood_port = p;
> +}
> +
> +static void br_del_flood_port(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct net_bridge *br)
> +{
> + struct net_bridge_port *port;
> +
> + /* Decrement the number of flood port.
> + * If we are deleting the current flood port, clear
> + * the cached port. If we are down to 1 flood port,
> + * set it if it is not set.
> + */
> + br->n_flood_ports--;
> + if (p == br->c_flood_port)
> + br->c_flood_port = NULL;
> +
> + if (br->n_flood_ports == 1) {
> + list_for_each_entry(port, &p->br->port_list, list) {
> + if (port->flags & BR_FLOOD) {
> + br->c_flood_port = port;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void br_port_flags_change(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long mask)
> +{
> + struct net_bridge *br = p->br;
> +
> + /* We are only interested FLOOD flag */
> + if (!(mask & BR_FLOOD))
> + return;
> +
> + if (p->flags & BR_FLOOD)
> + br_add_flood_port(p, br);
> + else
> + br_del_flood_port(p, br);
> +}
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index e74b6d53..01382b9 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ static void br_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[],
> static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[])
> {
> int err;
> + unsigned long old_flags = p->flags;
>
> br_set_port_flag(p, tb, IFLA_BRPORT_MODE, BR_HAIRPIN_MODE);
> br_set_port_flag(p, tb, IFLA_BRPORT_GUARD, BR_BPDU_GUARD);
> @@ -353,6 +354,8 @@ static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[])
> if (err)
> return err;
> }
> +
> + br_port_flags_change(p, old_flags ^ p->flags);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 3ba11bc..26a3987 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -290,6 +290,8 @@ struct net_bridge
> struct timer_list topology_change_timer;
> struct timer_list gc_timer;
> struct kobject *ifobj;
> + struct net_bridge_port *c_flood_port;
> + u32 n_flood_ports;
any hints on locking for these fields?
are these all under rtnl?
> #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING
> u8 vlan_enabled;
> struct net_port_vlans __rcu *vlan_info;
> @@ -415,6 +417,8 @@ int br_del_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev);
> int br_min_mtu(const struct net_bridge *br);
> netdev_features_t br_features_recompute(struct net_bridge *br,
> netdev_features_t features);
> +void br_port_flags_change(struct net_bridge_port *port,
> + unsigned long mask);
>
> /* br_input.c */
> int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> index 7f66aa4..9ff6691 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,10 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, \
> static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
> unsigned long mask)
> {
> - unsigned long flags = p->flags;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long old_flags;
> +
> + old_flags = flags = p->flags;
>
> if (v)
> flags |= mask;
> @@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
>
> if (flags != p->flags) {
> p->flags = flags;
> + br_port_flags_change(p, old_flags ^ flags);
> br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p);
> }
> return 0;
> --
> 1.8.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 15:18 [Bridge] [PATCH RFC 0/7] Non-promisc bidge ports support Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 1/7] bridge: Turn flag change macro into a function Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 15:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2/7] bridge: Keep track of ports capable of flooding Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-02-26 15:41 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-27 11:59 ` Toshiaki Makita
2014-02-27 12:54 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 3/7] bridge: Add addresses from static fdbs to bridge address list Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 15:43 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 16:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 17:25 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 17:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 16:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-02-26 17:35 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-27 7:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-27 13:08 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-27 13:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 15:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 4/7] bridge: Automatically manage port promiscuous mode Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 16:02 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-02-26 17:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 15:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 5/7] bridge: Correctly manage promiscuity when user requested it Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 6/7] bridge: Manage promisc mode when vlans are configured on top of a bridge Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 16:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 16:05 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 16:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-27 12:06 ` Toshiaki Makita
2014-02-27 13:17 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-28 19:34 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-03-01 14:57 ` Toshiaki Makita
2014-03-03 12:12 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 7/7] bridge: Support promisc management when all ports are non-flooding Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-26 15:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-27 3:46 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-27 7:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 16:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 16:34 ` [Bridge] [PATCH RFC 0/7] Non-promisc bidge ports support Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-26 23:59 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-02-27 3:37 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-02-27 8:54 ` Amidu Sila
2014-02-27 7:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140226154122.GC15330@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox