From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HqMTbCWSfnW2iygd8S3qIxs+5b3UuvJjn6Tu1L46aIo=; b=jWYUbqSPKXQ830ciUlET0l9Dv8KX97mBUr6LGVcYk1WQ/LzrQQCDId7vU9P9oW3U3j LrhsDfF/ylu1R5aXGsJJ5UxEalTxWHnm/aAcuDSq1mjxvbjTQPPVs8AlTGFmSHXU6UEW /lQ3eUwT0rFhvpOk+s07l9wpH4Go6rIMRRu+mXwhDVw0PMgc+aOQ4JkaBWgtoC1uw2hL pKAU5KQFAGuFBtYxI+EjDLjWBFX+xO0WeFbQsCWU2QB4MgUPlcb8XJMzav+EaAzSNVj9 wEZmUWSArZLDHhufKcsFyaoOHP2yGqXoYDAUIlEj4GQfdEGE5UynvpOZE3/RGHYFQD5H knBw== Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 19:13:56 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger Message-ID: <20170106191356.43740a26@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20170102193214.31723-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> References: <20170102193214.31723-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: multicast to unicast List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Linus =?UTF-8?B?TMO8c3Npbmc=?= Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Felix Fietkau On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 20:32:14 +0100 Linus L=C3=BCssing wrote: > This feature is intended for interface types which have a more reliable > and/or efficient way to deliver unicast packets than broadcast ones > (e.g. wifi). Why is this not done in MAC80211 rather than bridge?