From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=uCfLc/WV2h+9eU4PSTpFaLeolHru7 0urNNEjhMvTHpY=; b=SvjW5RfaTFdRek2MEHXjNT5eEyp/iLu7I+TWU00aPCdLU UNMsICni7JLSgDuOqCzAL03Re6mTl/FhICvyWe+9UBzYng96U48gvS7ahkiSu+E9 LZw6GjsUmZ9oPqcAU4gooznkfhaMGW3YXqNr9Jk/X3ulW8VO5FbUMpzxnmmNS/Vv kxUkmlm9AqpyshYoOnIVSNxwf9J5CgH5t+cZycjRgyWSddPX0GzoDhzsrqDk4NJ0 drMSno5wqTUR5jDFS4htYueDl+7I8J6/bgyyLUkcFlNm1KDLnfkfRpkRNJA7QqUn ZFZCLs0/Cv24EUdDGi06HwCxz1K5uisolg8l0RHFA== Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:04:33 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel Message-ID: <20181001190433.GA29874@splinter> References: <1420505776-26827-1-git-send-email-bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at> <2327925.x0GQ7AZp12@blindfold> <20181001184821.GA29148@splinter> <2473404.DTJdS9eVm5@blindfold> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2473404.DTJdS9eVm5@blindfold> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 1/1] bridge: remove BR_GROUPFWD_RESTRICTED for arbitrary forwarding of reserved addresses List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Weinberger Cc: David Gstir , Florian Fainelli , nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at, "David S. Miller" On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 08:54:08PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > So the only option is having a bridge and transport STP via tc-mirred > or patching the bridge code (what we do right now). And I vote for the first option. I understand it involves more typing, but I see no reason to push more complexity into the kernel - and break standards - when you can relatively easily accomplish the same thing in other ways. Adding Nik and Roopa who now maintain the bridge code and should eventually decide about this.