From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=opy2LGo8EiMuXbwuiWz62GkRvsGmq1zFVRcUmTfeyis=; b=0iYNetQTXrlSwCH6KOhIteuxSo 0oCJj5MunUT7NBQ86QHygqqF96PeA5dubjKssDfukyNYPVpVaRmDvFLX8Inb1WYoIPFkjgYrxxJzE BB9eqt3xUPUl8Ir4eG/E56qc8ABNjp6sd9Txv9vDv0EjArWwgGRdn1iQtj4sP/2Etf/0=; Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:18:24 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20190827131824.GC11471@lunn.ch> References: <1566807075-775-1-git-send-email-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20190826123811.GA13411@lunn.ch> <20190827101033.g2cb6j2j4kuyzh2a@soft-dev3.microsemi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190827101033.g2cb6j2j4kuyzh2a@soft-dev3.microsemi.net> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add NETIF_F_HW_BR_CAP feature List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Horatiu Vultur Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com, davem@davemloft.net > That sounds like a great idea. I was expecting to add this logic in the > set_rx_mode function of the driver. But unfortunetly, I got the calls to > this function before the dev->promiscuity is updated or not to get the > call at all. For example in case the port is member of a bridge and I try > to enable the promisc mode. Hi Horatiu What about the notifier? Is it called in all the conditions you need to know about? Or, you could consider adding a new switchdev call to pass this information to any switchdev driver which is interested in the information. At the moment, the DSA driver core does not pass onto the driver it should put a port into promisc mode. So pcap etc, will only see traffic directed to the CPU, not all the traffic ingressing the interface. If you put the needed core infrastructure into place, we could plumb it down from the DSA core to DSA drivers. Having said that, i don't actually know if the Marvell switches support this. Forward using the ATU and send a copy to the CPU? What switches tend to support is port mirroring, sending all the traffic out another port. A couple of DSA drivers support that, via TC. Andrew